Preview

Using Hyperfocal Distance to Ensure Maximum Depth of Field in Landscape Photography

Final Product What You'll Be Creating

This entry is part 9 of 14 in the Landscapes Session
« PreviousNext »

Twice a month we revisit some of our reader favorite posts from throughout the history of Phototuts+. This tutorial was first published in October, 2009.

Have you ever got home after what you thought was a great day’s photography, only to upload your images and find that they were sharp in either the foreground or background but with the rest of the image not quite in focus?

By applying the simple rules of Hyperfocal Distance you can be sure that you are shooting images which are sharp from foreground to background on almost every occasion. I will be using an image that I took recently of Castlerigg Stone Circle to show you how you can put these simple rules into practice so that you can obtain maximum depth of field (DOF) in all your landscape images.


1. Introduction

The hyperfocal distance is the point at which you should focus your lens to allow you to get maximum DOF. Once you’ve focused on this point, everything from half the hyperfocal distance to infinity will be sharp. This means that if you’re focused at a hyperfocal distance of 10 metres then, five metres to infinity will be sharp.If you simply focus on the subject itself, then only one-third of the area in front of that subject and two-thirds of the area behind it will be sharp.

A simple cheat that will work most of the time, is to focus one third of the way into the scene. Whilst this works up to a point, to obtain maximum depth of field, you will need to calculate the hyperfocal distance correctly!


Step 1

I took the above image at Castlerigg Stone Circle near Keswick which is in the northern part of the English Lake District. The stone circle, which is owned by the National Trust but is free to visit, lies on the top of a low hill with great views across to the fells in all directions. It is approximately 30 metres in diameter with the tallest stone being 2.3 metres high. There is plenty of interest in the foreground, middle ground and background making it a perfect place to illustrate hyperfocal distance rules. If you get your calculations correct, the stones in the foreground at the front of the circle, the stones in the middle distance at the back of the circle and the fells in the distance should all be sharp and in focus.

Step 2

I took the shot using my Canon EOD 5D full-frame digital SLR fitted with a Canon ‘L’ series 24-105mm zoom lens. I used a Lee 0.3 ND grad filter to correctly expose by one stop the lighter background with the darker foreground containing the stones. The use of ND grads to obtaining correct exposure is a subject worthy of a tutorial in its own right and too complex to discuss here in any depth.

My camera was placed on a Manfrotto 055 PROB tripod with an 804RCT 3 pan-tilt head which gives me excellent stability on uneven terrain and in the gale force winds that summer in the Lake District can often bring! I use this in conjunction with a Canon RS80 remote switch to obtain the crisp images essential for printing and publishing. It’s no use carefully composing your image and going to the trouble of calculating the hyperfocal distance correctly if the camera then moves when you press the shutter!

NOTE: Before you start to shoot, you will need to go into your camera’s menu system and make sure that you are able to change individual focusing points. (See your user manual if you need hep on how to do this).

Step 3

Firstly, I needed to compose the shot. I always try to do this using the rule of thirds so that I will end up with a well-balanced image. The idea here is to divide your camera’s viewfinder into a jigsaw puzzle containing nine even pieces – three across and three down. The focal point of your scene should then be placed along any of the four intersection points. It’s also good to place the horizon or any other strong feature along one of the horizontal lines; either one third from the top or one third from the bottom of the scene.

The image below that I took of Scale Force illustrates this composition rule perfectly and I have superimposed a grid over it to make it more obvious. The waterfall flows down along the left vertical grid line and there are strong focal points on three out of the four intersections. Whilst there is no real horizon here, the waterfall is contained in the top two-thirds of the image.

hyperfocal distance depth of field

But remember rules can be broken sometimes as you can see from one of my best selling images – Morning Mist on Buttermere. In this image the tree silhouette has been placed directly in the middle of the scene which is what gives it impact.

hyperfocal distance depth of field

If you apply this to my finished image, you will see that I have ensured that significant stones fare placed on or close to the two lower intersection points giving the image balance. As there is no real horizon here, I have placed the field edge close to the lower horizontal line and the line of bracken on the fells perfectly on the upper horizontal line. Also, the stones fit nicely into the bottom three pieces of the jigsaw puzzle, the fells into the middle three pieces and the cloud formations into the top three pieces. The image shows strong elements in all nine pieces with the stones forming a perfect ‘lead-in line’ to the image. As you always read a book from left to right so a human eye views an image from bottom left to top right, so it is important for an image to grab the eye where it instinctively first looks for something. For this reason, I have placed one of the large stones, in the bottom leftmost piece. I have only just touched on composition here, as this is a big subject worthy of a tutorial in its own right and too complex to discuss here in any more depth.

hyperfocal distance depth of field

Step 4

So let’s imagine for a moment that I knew nothing about hyperfocal distance rules. I would set my camera to aperture priority (AV on most digital SLRs) and to f22 thinking that this f-stop would give me maximum depth of field. Because I would be using a tripod and shutter release, the shutter speed would not really be that relevant as there would be very little chance of camera shake. But I would choose a low ISO (160) to try to ensure that I got a good crisp image. With my chosen lens, I would set the focal length to 24mm to obtain the widest angle shot that I could to get in most of the stones in the circle. Because the stones are the main subject of the scene, I would focus on the stones in the foreground. The resulting image would appear sharp but diffraction would occur. This is caused when light passes sharp edges or goes through narrow slits deflecting the rays of light to produce fringes of light and dark bands which distort the image. Whilst this will not be noticeable on your LCD and you may think that it looks just fine, it will be more noticeable when the image is viewed at a larger size or printed.

The following images show the results that I would get using the same ISO and focal length but changing my f-stop to f11, which is the optimum f-stop to get maximum depth of field for landscape photography, but focusing on various parts of the scene.

Step 5

In this image, I focused on the fells in the background. As you can see, the stones in the foreground are out of focus whilst the fells and a third of the distance from the fells backwards towards the camera are sharp and in focus.

hyperfocal distance depth of field

Step 6

In this image, I focused on the stones in the middle ground. Here the stones nearest to the camera are slightly out of focus, the stones in the middle ground and the fells in the background are sharp and in focus.

hyperfocal distance depth of field

Step 7

I will now let you into the simple secret which will correct all the above focusing problems and allow you to obtain the maximum depth of field in your landscape images. Let’s start with the formula for calculating hyperfocal distance. Don’t worry about it; it’s much less complicated than it looks!

hyperfocal distance depth of field

Focal length – This will, of course, be different for every image that you take. For my shot of Castlerigg Stone Circle I used my 24 to 105mm lens at its widest focal length i.e. 24mm. This value can be read off from the top of your lens barrel once you are happy with your composition. For fixed length lenses just use the fixed focal length of your prime lens.

Circle of confusion – All you need to know here is that this constant differs depending on the type of camera that you are using and is based on what is considered to be acceptable sharpness in an 8” x10” print seen at normal viewing distance. The most popular values are as follows:-

Digital SLR = 0.02
35mm format and digital SLR full-frame = 0.03
6x6cm format = 0.06
4x5in format = 0.15

F-stop – The optimum f-number for landscape photography is considered to be either f11 or f13. My preferred f-stop is f11 as I find that this gives you the maximum depth of field without any diffraction occurring.

Step 8

Using the above formula, the hyperfocal distance for my shot was calculated as follows:-

hyperfocal distance depth of field

Therefore, the hyperfocal distance is approximately 1.8 metres.

Step 9

Once you have calculated this figure, you now know the distance from your tripod that you need to focus on to obtain maximum depth of field. Without re-composing your photograph, you now need to identify an object which is that distance away from your tripod and set the focusing point on your camera on this object. Your camera will have a number of focusing points displayed on its LCD and you need to make active the focusing point that is covering this object. Again, you need to consult your camera’s manual if you are unsure how to make this focusing point active. Everything from this focusing point (i.e. the hyperfocal distance) to infinity and half way between this focusing point and the tripod will now be sharp and in focus. If you are unable to make a focusing point active on an object then switch your lens to manual focus and focus on the object manually.

Step 10

In this image, I focused on the hyperfocal distance point of 1.8 metres which I estimated to be on the two stones in the left foreground. As you can see, the result is an image which is crisp and sharp from front to back. Also, half the distance between the hyperfocal point and the tripod (approx 0.9 of a metre) would also be pin sharp.

hyperfocal distance depth of field


2. Conclusion

OK, so calculating the hyperfocal distance is a bit more effort and you may need to carry a calculator around when you first start to use this technique. But providing that you stick to either f11 or f13 for your landscapes, you will soon remember the different hyperfocal distances for the lenses and focal lengths that you normally shoot at. To help you, I have set out two tables below which show the hyperfocal distances at various focal lengths for the most commonly used cameras. All you need to know is the focal length multiplier i.e. crop factor of your camera and choose the appropriate table. Your manual will help you here. Cut out the appropriate table, laminate it and put it into your gear bag. Believe me; you will be truly amazed at the results that you will you get from making such a small effort.

Table 1 – Hyperfocal Distance Calculator for Digital SLR Cameras with a Focal Length Multiplier of 1.6

hyperfocal distance depth of field

Table 2 – Hyperfocal Distance Calculator for 35mm and Full Frame Digital SLR Cameras with no Focal Length Multiplier

hyperfocal distance depth of field

  • Nic Simons

    Wow, the end result is very nice

    Thanks

  • http://www.stevendavisphoto.com Steven Davis

    Very nice tutorial. I’ve been shooting for a while and know most of the tricks, but have never been able to understand hyperfocal focusing. This made it all clear. Thanks! :)

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/fallingwaters Don Marsh

    Nicely written tutorial. For iPhone/iPod touch users out there, there are some nice HF calculator apps out there.

  • http://www.mindwarpentertainment.com Octavio Corral

    nice. I will for sure use this in the future

  • http://www.stevebeyatte.com steve

    Great tut! Such a temptation for beginning photogs to use maximum aperture for landscapes yet results are never really that great, this tut clears it all up!

  • http://www.kakomu.com mat

    As an aside, when you downsize your images to 600px wide, it becomes difficult to discern what is and is not in focus between images 5 and 6.

  • Jon

    I had no idea! Thanks for sharing this tip. Can’t wait to go out and try it.

  • Peter Tellone

    An easy way to set the Hyperfocal distance on your lens is to switch it to manual focus and use the distance scale and set it to the correct HF focus distance. Saves you from having to find an object for your AF to lock onto at the correct distance. But of course this would only work if your lens has a distance scale. Most better ones do. But it is quick and repeatable

    • http://www.martinlawrencephotography.com Martin Lawrence
      Author

      Hi Peter

      Thanks for your comments. Your absolutely right, for lenses that have a distance scale you can use this scale to manually focus on the hyperfocal distance. Unfortunately there are alot of lenses out there that have no distance scale and some of the ones that have, are not that accurate at the higher focal lengths. So for these lenses this is a perfect way of calculating hyperfocal distance. Thanks again for your comments.

      Martin

  • James

    Never fully understood hyperfocal focusing but this article helps a lot. Thanks for that, can’t wait to try it out this weekend.

  • http://davezero.com davezero

    nicely explained. thumbs up

  • Phil

    Thank you Martin, now I just have to convert the distance, from metric to the American system.

  • Neil

    What an awesome tutorial! However, I’m a newbie and still can’t figure out how to do it on my Canon 50D. :(

  • R

    hi. i find your article interesting. however…

    I have a Canon 500D – crop factor 1.6
    Circle of Confusion, according to your guidelines: 0.02
    I will still to take some shots at different apertures above f11 but for now, i’ll consider f11 as the best

    The problem is that I don’t end-up with the same values you do. For instance, at 17mm aperture, calculation would go as (I think):

    17 x 1.6 = 27.2

    HD = [(27.2)^2 ] / (0.02 * 11) = 739.84 / 0.22 = aprox 3363 (3.36 m)

    IN YOUR TABLE THE VALUE IS 1.43m

    why?

    • Martin Lawrence
      Author

      Hi R

      MK ‘s reply below is right. The CoC is taken into account with the different types of camera you can use so you don’t need to use the 1.6 in your calculation. Use coc of 0.02 for a DSLR with a crop factor of 1.6. Use coc of 0.03 for a Full Frame DSLR (ie canon eos 5d mk 11).

      Hope this helps.

      Martin

  • MK

    Hi R,
    I’ve been doing a bit of checking around hyperfocal distance etc and I’m sure I read somewhere along the way that the crop factor is taken in to account in the COC. So you wouldn’t do the multiplication x 1.6 in your calculation.
    I’m open to contradication/clarification on this.
    MK

    • Martin Lawrence
      Author

      Hi MK

      You are absolutely right – the crop factor of full frame is taken into account in the coc. ie DSLR crop factor of 1.6 the coc is 0.02 and a DSLR full frame the coc is 0.03.

      Thanks for you reply to R.

      Martin

  • Karolis

    Thank you Martin. It’s the clearest description of using DOF in practice I’ve seen on the web.

  • Ken

    Extremely nice tutorial. Thanks so much for sharing your time & info.
    A small geeky observation. I made a small spreadsheet to build out a table and found the numbers are slightly different than yours in Table 2. If you notice, the example you worked out in Step 8 is slightly off in the table as well (1.77 in the table vs. 1.75 from the manual calculation). Maybe I’m missing something?

    Again – thanks for the clear explanation. Best I’ve seen!

  • iam braydon

    I really do not like technician talk and try to stay away from it.

    However, I found your info interesting. One will never find me ‘down the camera club’ talking about this stuff as I would rather just go out and shoot!

    Thanks for your post and I wish you well.

    braydon

  • Martin Lawrence
    Author

    Hi Eli

    Thanks for this and sorry for the delay in replying as I have been extremely busy with doing photography courses. Using a focal length of 24 on either of these lenses should produce the same result providing you are using the same aperture ie f13 and the same camera. If your camera is either a film camera or DSLR full frame then the circle of confusion should be 0.03 if it’s a DSLR crop factor of 1.6 then the CoC should be 0.02. Therefore DSLR full frame / film at a focal length of 24 at f13 the hfd should be around 1.75 meters. A DSLR crop factor of 1.6 should be around 2.6 meters. Just make sure that you change the focusing point on your camera to focus on this distance which sometimes isn’t easy. As you have mentioned focusing at infinity will make sure that this area is in focus but only half way between infinity and where you are stood will also be in focus. This is why your foreground is now out of focus. Hope this helps.
    Martin.

  • http://www.robferrolphotography.co.uk R Ferrol

    Thank you so much for this article that has helped a great deal with my “Circle of Confusion” regarding hyperfocal distance etc. I do still have a little confusion regarding the focus points when using wide andle lenses.

    If i use my Sigma 10-20mm wide open at f22 the hyperfocal distance is calulated at around 0.24m. If the camera was on a tripod at head height (1.58m) the nearest object in the viewfinder would be, lets say pebbles on a beach, at least this distance away. At f11 the hyperfocal distance becomes 0.48m but this is still too short to focus a head height image.

    How do we focus in these situations, or am i still very confused about this subject.

    Many thanks

    R Ferrol

  • Donald

    R Ferrol

    The issue as you present is, indeed, confusing. The answer to it is – You need to get down low. The secret of a lens such as the Sigma 10-20 (Ive got the Tokina 11-16 f2.8) is to get old clothes on be prepared to be lying on your stomach. I think thats what shooting with these lenses is really about. Theres not a lot thats going to work in landscapes is you stay in the standing position.

  • Wendy Cooper

    Hello.
    This is a great article, but all of the images are missing. Can they be re-posted?

    Thanks,
    Wendy

  • kagunkag

    Hi Martin,

    awesome knowledge u gave.
    i bought canon dslr 1yr back.
    till now i was unable to figure out how to take landscapes with sharp focus.

    just after reading ur tutorial, i calculated hyperfocal distance for my cam(18-55mm usm canon lense) and went out to a nature park, took photos. most of them are awesome sharp.

    ur tutorial on the net is the best.

    thank you so much for sharing ur knowledge.

    i want to go through all your articles to learn more.

    keep sharing your knowledge.

    thanks,
    kagunkag

  • LBotero

    I wonder why the HFD method has not work for me yet. I got very excited to see such a detailed tutorial and even more when I realized that I was shooting with the exact same lens (Canon 24mm-105mm)
    Ive run repeated tests making some variations to the the 1.8m distance and for some reason I cant obtain sharpness in both the foreground and the background. I have a steady tripod and tried focussing manually or using the individual focussing points.
    Im using the 5D Mark II and wonder if the large sensor could be part of the issue. Ive hard something to that effect? Im traveling at the moment and feel like Ive missed some great opportunities by not being able to take advantage of this method and obtain the best focus possible.
    I would very much like to find the answer to the problem, but if I cant would you advise that I get a 24mm fixed lens?
    I appreciate your help. And again thank you for the detailed tutorial!
    LBotero

    • netflash

      This article explains HFD wonderfully! Still, I have a question. If I’m taking a photo of someone at a distance of 2 meters, with a focal distance of 50mm and an aperture of f5.6, I get an Hyperfocal of 23.89m. Where should I focus? At 24m??

    • chris58b

      One variable to be mindful of is that the recommended CoC is based on the minimum acceptable sharpness of an 8×10 print. If you are particular about focus based IQ you may find this method better:-
      For my 5D MK2 i use a CoC of 0.015 which gives a minimum acceptable sharpness of an 16×20 print.
      I find this is gives greater overall focus as it is intended to be printed out at a much larger size thus requires a tighter tolerance for focus . In reality, it just moves your hyperfocal distance a little further away. However, keep in mind that the lower the camera, the closer the foreground becomes.

      Google ” flexible Hyperfocal distance calculator” and try some of the suggested CoC/HFD based on larger output print sizes and see how the focus/IQ compares to the original recommended CoC figures.

  • ADLER CHALK

    If you are new, do not worry. It is NOT this complicated. Try some of the tips and find a way that works for you. Try not to worry about the calculator. Leave that for old-timers!

    Good luck!

  • http://www.kcore.org/ Jan

    Just one short comment: perhaps the formulas could be corrected to use the appropriate symbols – multiplying mm by mm gives you mm^2 (squared), not just mm.

    Otherwise, great tutorial! Thanks.

  • Cheryl

    thank you! I was confused as to exactly what to do and why and now it’s all very clear..I now know I need a small measure tape included in my bag. I’m excited to give this a try! thank you so much. I use the dofmaster online on my android and it’s great especially now that I understand what I’m doing

    thank you!!!!!!

  • 7words

    As it seems, at least my Canon 7d is capable of computing the hyperfocal distance. exiftool -k shows a field in the EXIF data of my RAW-files called “Hyperfocal Distance” which is filled with the correct value (apart from a slight rounding (?) difference) of 37.33 m for a pic shot with a 50 mm lens at f3.5 (the coc is 0.019 mm).

    It’s just a shame that the auto-focus system cannot automatically use this value to control the lens and set it to hyperfocal distance. (Or did I miss something in the manual? I bought the cam just recently…) Such a feature would make landscape photography so much simpler.

    Thanks for the tutorial.
    7words

  • TJ

    Excellent article. However, when I run the numbers from the tables, I get different results. For example,

    24mm*24mm 576mm(2)
    —————— = ————– = 2618.18mm or 2.61m
    .02mm*11 .22mm

    yet the table states that the correct HFD is 2.83m. This is a difference of 8.4% which could be quite significant when it comes to focusing into a scene.

    Am I misunderstanding something?

  • http://the666bbq.blogspot.com/2011/02/hoe-peter-peter-werd.html the666bbq

    I really like the table-less explanation of hyperfocal distance (I follow Peter Tellone on that one) : the only theory you need is 1/3 DOF (Depth Of Field, ‘the sharp zone’) is before focal point, 2/3 is behind and you don’t want any of that 2/3 go beyond infinity because everything after infinity is … infinitely sharp by default (visit infinity and you will see for yourself that everything there is tack sharp). So just don’t focus on infinity as the newbie guides to landscape photography tell you and you will already gain sharpness in the front area.

    so :

    0………………………………………………………..8
    0……………………………………….SSSSSSSS F SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
    0………SSSSSSSS F SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
    0………………………………………………………..8

    instead of having Focus (F) on infinity (8) you want the end of the latter DOF “zone” at infinity.

    How are you going to mesure 2,83m when there is no object in the field ?? Oh my fault, we could of course give our wifes, you have been carrying all our camera gear so far, a rest at say exactly 2,83m ;-)

    Manual focus would be easier, and with a lens with distance marks all the math is already done. You don’t focus on anything, you set the zones where everything appears to be sharp to where you need it.
    Just to say that hyperfocal point is not that difficult to understand and it can be done without a calculator.

  • http://the666bbq.blogspot.com/2011/02/hoe-peter-peter-werd.html the666bbq

    it is also a bit silly to focus on the two stones left in the foreground because you have no foreground left so there you do the opposite of what I was saying : the 1/3 of DOF that goes before the focal point (your stones) is “lost” because you hardly have any foreground before those stones in the composition.that would make my previous example go :

    sss 0 SSS F SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS 8

    but probably even

    sss 0 SSS F SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS……………….. 8

    second situation double silly because you have gained sharpness outside your composition (sss) and lost sharpness near infinity (….) (espacially if you open aperture since DOF will be shallower from the beginning).
    Even when the 1/3 DOF before the focal point does not go beyond 0, it will go outside your composition and you don’t need sharpness outside your composition (between you and the bottom border of the composition)

  • http://www.bycostello.com bycostello

    Not usre i understand why f11 is best, if it is half the distance to infinity that is in focus, your table suggest f22 is best?

    • 7words

      As mentioned in Step 4 of the tutorial, the whole image is less sharp at f22 than at f11 because of the diffraction of the light occuring at the edges of the aperture blades of your lens. Just search for “diffraction” and you’ll find plenty of tutorials/articles on this topic.

      Regards,
      7words

  • ML

    >As you always read a book from left to right

    Uhm, not true. Tell that to Jews or Arabs who read right to left, and to Japanese who read top to bottom.

  • Albert Taal

    Thanks for this great tutorial. Before today i had never even heard of a HFD or DOF. I can’t wait to try it out ASAP.

  • Liam Jones

    Awesome tutorial, really helped me get my head around it all!
    Just for those wanting to work out the HFD there are many apps for iPhones, iPod Touches and iPads (I guess android too), saves carrying a calculator or chart around :D
    Thanks,
    Liam.

  • http://www.denisHogan.com denis

    Thanks for that. I will give it a shot. I normally take 2 or more shots, 1 focusing on close and the other/s increase the focus further in the background, then I blend them…uumh, I think your way is much more effcient and will also check if my lens has the HF functionality.

    cheers
    Denis (Australia)

  • BM

    Could you please address TJ’s question above?

    24mm*24mm 576mm(2)
    —————— = ————– = 2618.18mm or 2.61m not 2.83m as you said in your table (cameras with a multiplier
    .02mm*11 .22mm

    of 1.6. Whose number is right? You gave a great tutorial. Many thanks for the efforts. But if the numbers in your table are incorrect, readers of your article are going to be frustrated in doing their own shoots.

  • Andrei

    Great tutorial!

    I have one question though. Can you explain how you ended up with the values in the first table (the one with Focal Length Multiplier of 1.6)?

    I used your formula for 17mm & f11 and I ended up having :

    17*17 / 0.2*11 = 1313.63 which is ~1.3 m but the table you have written the 1.43 m value;

    Thank you in advance!

    Best regards,
    Andrei

  • adam

    best tutorial on hyperfocal distance ive read about while searching on google.hands down.

  • Neil

    Just set your adjustable focus point one third of the way into the composed view.
    Its just as accurate as trying to guess distance in feet/metres but a whole lot quicker!

  • http://www.landscapephotograhpy.com kiwigram

    Thank you. I have been wondering how to get the hyperfocal distance ever since I bought my first digital. It was easy on the old lenses that had all of the f stops engraved on them, but these newer lens do not have that feature.

  • Alex

    “Step 10
    In this image, I focused on the hyperfocal distance point of 1.8 metres which I estimated to be on the two stones in the left foreground

    1.What are the two stones you’re talking about? the “frontest” 2 triangles? or those 2 sticked together?

    2.What about the “wrong” values in tables?

    Thanks in advance.

  • Alex

    I’ve done the following step and no risults:

    1. enabled the Manual focus on the lens.
    2. set it to 1.9 (’cause from 1.5 and 3 i didn’t succed in finding 1.7 or 1.8) – 24mm – 5MDII , f/11.
    3. press the shutter button.

    Risult, :(, nothing, useless photos, are a little better with distance scale at infinity.

    Should i try to find an object to AF (automatic) and switch to manual focus to lock, and after that to take the photo?

    PLS I BEG, is there anyone that could help me, it’s frustrating to see crystal clear photos all over the internet at others :(.

    Can u tell me the exactly steps to do :(.

  • Bill Brown

    Great tutorial, as close to hands-on instruction as one could ask.

  • John Perry

    One of the clearest tutorials I have ever seen, thank you.

  • Neal

    I am like a lot of the other readers a little confused over the calculations, mine too differ from yours!

    24mm X 24mm = 576mm and 0.03 X 11 = 0.33 and 576mm : 0.33 = 1745.25mm = 1.74m were you have 1.77m

  • http://www.clippingpathindia.com/clipping-path-service.html Image Editing

    Every Step are good tips to make better Photography . Hope so…. Thanks

  • Mick

    Thanks for the explanation.Best I have found.Looking forward to using it.

  • rssin23

    excellent article, even beter than luminous landscape