Quick Tip: Creating Artificial Bokeh in Your Own Home

Quick Tip: Creating Artificial Bokeh in Your Own Home

Tutorial Details
  • Difficulty: Intermediate
  • Completion Time: 15-30 Minutes

Final Product What You'll Be Creating

This entry is part 8 of 9 in the Depth-of-Field & Bokeh Session
« PreviousNext »

Bokeh refers to the out-of-focus area of a photograph, usually created by sources of light and color behind the subject. This quick tip will show you step-by-step the process of creating your own artificial bokeh using Christmas lights.

This is especially helpful if you wish to achieve a bokeh effect in the background, and you happen to be in an indoor environment lacking light sources best for bokeh. Adding artificial bokeh can create a very interesting and visually-pleasing effect for your photos.

Republished Tutorial

Every few weeks, we revisit some of our reader's favorite posts from throughout the history of the site. This tutorial was first published in March of 2011.


What Is Bokeh?

Bokeh is essentially blur. Many people take it as referring to the out-of-focus area of a photograph, which can be impacted and enhanced by sources of light and color behind the subject.

I am a huge fan of creative bokeh in photography, and because of my busy schedule, I end up having to shoot a lot of my photos at night in my house. I found out that shooting in this environment was very limiting, and that forced me to use other resources that you would not normally use in photography during the day or outside.

This quick tip will show you step-by-step the process of creating your own artificial bokeh out of Christmas lights for indoor photography. This effect is particularly useful if you are taking photos of a small inanimate objects or shots of pets and people.


What You Will Need

  • The Right Lens: To obtain the highest quality bokeh you can get, it is recommended that you use a lens with a very wide aperture, such as f/1.8 or f/1.4. For this tutorial, I will be using a Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 lens. Other lenses you could use include the Nikkor 50mm f/1.4, or Canon’s 50mm f/1.8 or f/1.4. If your lens is f/2 or smaller, you can still create bokeh, but your bokeh’s size and quality will suffer.
  • Christmas Lights (Any Color Will Do)
  • Tripod (Optional)
  • Flash + Flash Equipment (Optional)

Step 1

Set up your camera as you normally would for indoor shots, but set your camera’s aperture to the widest setting, preferably f/1.8 or f/1.4 (depending on your lens).

For this tutorial, I will be using a Nikkor 50mm f/1.8.


Step 2 (Optional)

If your indoor lighting is sufficient enough, you do not have to use flash. Try to set up your flash off your camera, aimed towards your subject. If the area in which you plan to place your lights has reflective surfaces, you could also aim your flash towards the background so that the light’s reflection off those surfaces create bokeh as well.

If you do not have a flash and your lighting is poor, you should use a tripod, and set your camera to a slower shutter speed.

For this tutorial, I will be using a Nikon SB-600 shot right of camera, diffused.


Step 3

Set up your Christmas lights. Try to spread the lights evenly across the background you plan to use, or arrange them to your taste. If you cannot find a way to prop up your lights, you can use a plain bookshelf and use binder clips to fasten the lights onto the shelves.

The Christmas lights that I used for this tutorial are automatically changing lights that go from white to blue.


Step 4

Set up your subject. I find that my bokeh turns out better if I place the subject at least four to five feet in front of the Christmas lights. The farther away you place the subject, the better.

The first image represents bokeh taken from 4-5 feet away, and the second image represents bokeh taken 1-2 feet away.

Of course, if you prefer your bokeh to be smaller, that’s up to you. It is just my personal preference.


Step 5

If you are not using a fixed lens, zoom your lens in all the way. This shot was taken using my Nikon Zoom Lens (55-200mm) at 95mm (the most I could zoom in the space I was in). Although my aperture was only set at f/4.5, I was able to achieve a better bokeh effect than if I had not zoomed in at all.


Step 6

Focus on your subject. Try to stay close to the subject, because if you are too away from it, your bokeh will suffer and appear smaller. This shot was taken with the same 50mm lens used in the final shot, but taken farther away, resulting in smaller bokeh.


Step 7

Release your camera’s shutter, and voila! You have produced a photo with artificial bokeh obtained from simple Christmas lights.


Artificial Bokeh Inspiration

Tags: Tips
  • http://wet-photo.blogspot.com/ WET

    Christmas lights! OF COURSE!! I never thought about this possibility :-D Thanks for pointing it out :-)

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/maxhabich/ Max H

    Thanks for sharing! I love your pictures!

  • http://peewee1002.co.uk Peter Sawyer

    Damn nice idea.

    My F1.4 canon 50mm almost never comes off my body now.

    Its awesome.

  • http://www.flickr.com/matt-402/ Matt-182

    the tutorial that was missing for me. \o/

    I just love it, so I spend hours watching creations
    on flickr.
    I had an idea how to do, and I know I need a 50 mm lens.
    awhile since I’m planning to buy my first canon 50mm 1.8.
    This tutorial only excited me more.

    thanks for sharing. :D

  • http://www.shaneparkerphoto.com Shane Parker

    “Bokeh refers to the out-of-focus area of a photograph”

    Bokeh isn’t the out-of-focus (OOF) area of a photograph (beginners today have incorrectly classified it that way). Bokeh is actually the subjective “quality” of the OOF area, not the OOF area itself. The quality of OOF (or bokeh) differs from lens to lens due to each lens aperture blade configuration, aberration characteristics, and other lens characteristics.

    Nice article otherwise, very basic, but always good to review the basics.

  • http://www.farstudio.net/gallery/ Lori Ann Cole

    I’ve tried using Christmas lights to make bokeh before this, but the photos didn’t turn out because I had the lights too close to my subject. This may be a basic tip, but the simple act of keeping the distance between the subject and the lights makes all the difference between mediocrity and elegance.

    Thanks!

  • Tex

    I learned something new. Thanks for sharing.

  • Mick Marrison

    One of the briefest, but most effective tutorials I have read. Thank you.

  • http://www.yilmazdekorasyon.com Yılmaz dekorasyon

    Thanks very good ..

  • http://robertlangdonwaters.deviantart.com/ Robert L. Waters

    I wouldn’t call this an artificial Bokeh. Its more of a artificial light source for bokeh purposes.

  • James

    Agreed with Robert. It’s not artificial Bokeh. It IS Bokeh, you’re just using Christmas lights to enhance the look.

    Great article for those unfamiliar with the concept though. I love seeing the range of articles here. There’s something for everyone!

  • Kris Hunt

    “Bokeh refers to the out-of-focus area of a photograph…”

    Wrong.

    “Bokeh is essentially blur.”

    Inexplicably wrong. Seriously, PhotoTuts? Ditto what Shane said.

    • http://www.lovemarie.com Marie Sturges
      Author

      Well I apologize for getting the definition wrong. Even though I failed to correctly explain bokeh, I think the readers will still find the tutorial just as useful. I wrote to the moderators of PhotoTuts+ to revise it, but I haven’t received a reply yet as to whether or not they will modify my article. The reason why I had a misleading definition can be blamed on the fact that every site states bokeh in similar ways, almost the same wording. I did not want it to look like I was stealing sentences word for word, so I tried to make an original definition that failed miserably. I apologize.

      • 7

        At little googling goes a long, long way… ;)

        http://neilvn.com/tangents/2009/01/10/bokeh-the-quality-of-blur/

        • http://www.lovemarie.com Marie Sturges
          Author

          Thanks! I feel like where it says “how pleasing the blur looks of the background areas” would be considered wrong here too. :/ I mean I don’t disagree with it, but I just say that because I haven’t seen anywhere else state it like that.

          • 7

            You havn’t seen it stated anywhere else like that because 99% of the articles about “bokeh” on the internet are horribly, awfully incorrect on what it is. Those little fuzzy or sharp edged circles you get with out of focus highlights are not bokeh in an of themselves. What you’re seeing in them is a manifestation of the lens’s circle of confusion; zeiss calls them aperture iris images:

            http://www.zeiss.com/C12567A8003B8B6F/EmbedTitelIntern/CLN_35_Bokeh_EN/$File/CLN35_Bokeh_en.pdf (warning, this is a pdf document, I suggest reading pages 25, 31-34, and 37, but the entire thing is pretty interesting, if somewhat technical.)

            These circles of confusion / iris images are related to bokeh, as are all aspects of a particular lenses ability to produce blur, but are only one small facet of “bokeh”.

            The most -concise- way to define bokeh would be to call it the appearance, character, or nature of out of focus areas in an image.
            The most -precise- way to define bokeh would be to call it the manner in which light beams no longer come together at a single point in an orderly manner. (derived from the original Japanese word boke; confusion, fuzziness)

            Any particular lens “has” bokeh. Whether a given lens produces pleasing bokeh is up to the viewer of the image; it’s a subjective thing. Generally speaking, poor bokeh is considered to be out of focus areas that still have pretty well defined edges. This can still leave a photo’s background feeling cluttered even though it isn’t in focus. This isn’t necessarily desirable, but I have seen some photos that use it to wonderful effect.

            I don’t always agree with Ken Rockwell on everything, but he’s got a pretty good quick, easy to understand condensed version of the zeiss article i posted earlier.
            http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/bokeh.htm

            In an “ideal” lens, every single sharp point of light would render, out of focus, as a fuzzy orb with next to no visible edge. I don’t know if I’ve ever seen this “ideal” in any photograph, ever. Usually the best we can hope for is to find a way to make those circles of confusion frame up in a manner than complements our subject.

          • http://www.shaneparkerphoto.com Shane Parker

            “The most -precise- way to define bokeh would be to call it the manner in which light beams no longer come together at a single point in an orderly manner.”

            Actually, that describes an out-of-focus area, not bokeh. Bokeh is the subjective quality of the areas where light beams no longer come together at a single point.

            Again, bokeh is the quality of the OOF area, it is not the OOF area itself, it is not the light or points of light that define an OOF area. Bokeh is a statement of quality of all of that stuff coming together in the OOF area.

            What you’re describing is the out of focus area itself. Those “points of light that no longer come together at a single point in an orderly manner” are what help create the out of focus area itself. When you say, “I like the quality of those out of focus points of light” or “I don’t like the the way that out of focus area turned out”, you’re talking about the quality of the out of focus points of light… that’s bokeh.

            To the author, don’t read wiki for a description of bokeh or all the blog/forum descriptions on the web; they usually have incorrect statements regarding bokeh and I think that’s what causes confusion for so many people. Use an actual dictionary description (dictionary.com):

            Main Entry: bokeh
            Part of Speech: n
            Definition: a Japanese term for the subjective aesthetic quality of out-of-focus areas of a photographic image
            Example: The bokeh, or quality of the blurred image in the photograph, was described and discussed.

            Let’s clear this up once and for all:

            1- “That out of focus area is bokeh” = False.
            2- “Those out of focus points of light are bokeh” = False.
            3- “The quality of that out of focus area is bokeh” = True.
            4- “The quality of the points of light in the out of focus area is bokeh” = True.

            In the end, a photo needs to have at least some out of focus area in order to represent bokeh since bokeh is only the subjective quality of OOF areas, it does not describe qualities of in-focus areas of a photograph.

        • http://www.lovemarie.com Marie Sturges
          Author

          Wow, all this arguing over my wrong definition. ._. I wish I hadn’t even included the definition and just assumed that people know what I was referring to. And also, I didn’t use Wikipedia for this article at all.

          I still haven’t received a reply from Phototuts+ about changing the definition, so I’m not sure what to do about that.

          • http://www.shaneparkerphoto.com Shane Parker

            Marie, there’s nothing wrong with a healthy conversation about it. In fact, you should be happy that your article is still getting attention! I don’t think anybody here is being nasty about anything, we’re just discussing a topic that relates to your article, there’s nothing wrong with that, that’s how we all learn. Not a big deal at all.

          • 7

            @Shane, Marie: I think all the discussion is awesome. Everybody learns something, and we all go away enriched by the process. Never be discouraged, always speak your thoughts, and always *always* be open to learning from someone else’s point of view. I think we (we being anyone who’s read your article) can all agree you’ve got great potential, and have done great work thus far. Keep going. :)

            @Shane: Most of my previous points were paraphrased from the Zeiss pdf article, which was mostly of a highly technical nature (anytime I came across a chart or a formula I skipped ahead… I’m not a physicist!) I’ll come back to your post for those 4 quick-and-simple points in the future, it’s a good way to put things concerning the subject matter.

          • http://shaneparkerphoto.com Shane Parker

            @Marie: For sure, don’t get discouraged. Like I said, most peoples articles just die off slowly with no discussion going on in the comments. Discussion is always a good thing! You’re on the right track, keep up the good work :)

            @7: I’ve actually saved that PDF to read later, thanks for sharing, I’m always interested in this technical stuff!

        • http://www.lovemarie.com Marie Sturges
          Author

          Oh, well that’s good then. :) I thought everyone was fighting over it, and I thought people were getting angry! Thanks for all the feed back. :)

  • http://ariesit.ru mobdick

    good idea (: senks

  • http://www.applyavon.co.uk Carl

    I love Bokeh, Thanks for sharing.

  • 9ale7

    really great idea !
    at first i thought you went out to the the street :)

  • http://www.twitter.com/chris_mcclellan chris

    Amazing tut.

  • http://www.graphicriver.net/Giallo?ref=Giallo Giallo

    One of the best photo tut ever seen. Congrats

  • ganaprakash

    i placed my xmas lights on a bookshelf, i seem to be getting the bookshelf also in the pic…. any tips to avoid that?

  • Mick

    Maria who cares about the definition? I’ve just leant a new skill. Great article thanks. Mick

  • Sripal

    i once accidentally got my self the same effect when a was photographing someone in front of christmas lights

    the bright spots are referred as “Specular Highlight”

    the shape of the highlights represent the shape of your lens iris

    the more the no of aperture or iris blades (6 or more) the smoother the circle will be

    u can control the shape of these highlights by using special filters that are available or u can make one by cutting a hole(smaller than your front element) of required shape(heart ,star …) on a opaque paper and use it like a filter in front of ur lens