How to Photograph Stunning Waterfalls

How to Photograph Stunning Waterfalls

Tutorial Details
  • Requirements: Wide angle zoom lens, Polarizing filter, Tripod
  • Difficulty: Intermediate

Final Product What You'll Be Creating

Twice a month we revisit some of our reader favorite posts from throughout the history of Phototuts+. This tutorial was first published in September, 2009.

Waterfalls are some of the most beautiful natural features you will ever get the opportunity to photograph. But though they can look simply stunning, photographing waterfalls is not easy to do well. How do you avoid your photos being too dark? How do you deal with clipping in the water? How do you compose your photos to capture the authentic beauty of the scene?

In this tutorial, nature photography expert Steve Berardi shares his best tips for photographing waterfalls.

Photographing waterfalls isn’t hard, but it does involve a lot of little tricks and techniques. This tutorial will focus on how to get that silky water effect and how to get the balanced light that helps bring out the contrast you usually find around waterfalls.

The key to getting a silky water effect is to use a slow shutter speed, so most of the techniques described below revolve around this simple idea.


Step 1: Get the right equipment

waterfall photography

Required: wide angle zoom lens, polarizing filter, tripod

Recommended: 2-stop neutral density filter, remote shutter release, telephoto zoom lens

Waterfalls are usually found in tight canyons, so most of the time a wide angle zoom lens will be necessary. The polarizing filterwaterfall photography is good for at least three reasons: it eliminates reflections on the water/rocks, saturates the greens around the waterfall, and reduces the amount of light entering your lens. Most importantly though, you need a tripod to stabilize your camera for the long exposures.

Although not required, a 2-stop ND filterwaterfall photography can help you get a longer shutter speed too (useful for brighter lighting conditions). A remote shutter release can help you get sharper images by preventing you from shaking the camera. And finally, a telephoto zoom lenswaterfall photography is helpful for zooming in on a specific part of the waterfall.


Step 2: Find waterfalls to photograph

Regardless of where you live, there’s a good chance you have a waterfall close by. You may not have hundreds in your area (unless you live in Oregon, USA), but if you do enough searching, you’re sure to find at least one!

So, where do you look? Well, here are a few methods I’ve used with great success:

  • Do a simple Google search (e.g. “illinois waterfalls”)
  • Search photos on Flickr
  • Look for a waterfall guidebook for your area
  • Go to any state park’s visitor center and ask a ranger

My favorite method is searching Flickr because it gives you a good idea of what the waterfall looks like, and if there’s enough shots of the waterfall it’ll help you explore new compositions.

waterfall photography

Step 3: Visit the waterfall at the right time

Depending on the water source of the waterfall, it may look drastically different throughout the seasons. For example, waterfalls that are fed primarily by melted snow are often dried up or reduced to drizzles by the end of summer. These waterfalls are usually best in late spring or early summer (in early spring they’re usually a little too strong). So, as part of scouting out waterfalls, it’s a good idea to find out the source of the water and visit the fall when it’s running strong enough.

It’s also important to visit the waterfall when lighting conditions are ideal. Balanced and diffused light is great for waterfalls because it helps bring out details in the shadows and amplify the contrast. The best diffused light occurs on overcast days (the clouds act as natural diffusers), but if you can’t wait for a cloudy day, then visit the waterfall at sunrise or sunset (as long as the entire fall is in the shade).

The worst time to photograph a waterfall is when half of it is in the shade and the other half is sunlit. Your camera won’t be able to handle that kind of contrast.


Step 4: Compose your image

When you arrive at the waterfall, don’t setup your tripod right away! Walk around the waterfall and look through the viewfinder to explore different angles and camera positions. Here are few tips for composing your image:

  • Shoot at an angle instead of directly in front of the falls
  • Zoom in closer with a telephoto lens and capture one small area instead of trying to capture the entire falls and surrounding area
  • Include foreground elements (e.g. rocks, flowers, etc)

As an example of the first tip, check out these two photos of the same waterfall (one shot was taken directly in front of the falls, and the other was taken from the side).

Notice the dramatic difference?

waterfall photography

waterfall photography


Step 5: Adjust your polarizing filter

Once you’ve found a good composition, then it’s time to carefully adjust your polarizing filter to maximize its effect. While looking through the viewfinder, just rotate the filter and watch for the reflections to disappear (at the same time the greens start to look a lot more saturated).

You might want to rotate it completely a few times just so you’re sure that you’ve found the best position.

waterfall photography

Step 6: Setup your camera for the shot

In order to get that silky water effect you see in all the waterfall photographs, you’ll need a long shutter speed. So, here are a few recommended settings to start with:

Set the camera to Manual mode. When I first started photographing waterfalls, I shot in shutter priority mode, but quickly switched to manual because the camera didn’t always choose the aperture I needed to get the right depth of field. If you’ve never shot in manual mode before, don’t worry. With waterfalls, shooting manual is especially easy.

Use a small aperture. This is necessary for two reasons: it helps you get a longer shutter and it helps keep everything in sharp focus. I recommend starting with f/16 and then going smaller if that doesn’t give you a slow enough shutter. Some photographers will tell you to always use the smallest aperture possible on your lens, but I avoid this because lenses usually lose sharpness at their smallest (and largest) apertures.

Use the lowest ISO speed on your camera. This also helps you get a longer shutter, but it has another benefit too: lower ISO speeds will produce less noise and capture more dynamic range. Since you’ll be using a long shutter speed, your image will be much more sensitive to noise, so a low ISO will help prevent that noise.

Start with a shutter speed of a few seconds. When photographing waterfalls, finding the right shutter speed involves a lot of experimentation, but a speed of 2 seconds is usually a good place to start. Be prepared to use shutter speeds ranging from 1 to 30 seconds.

Okay, enough with setting everything up, let’s start snapping some photos!


Step 7: Take the shot and review

After you take your shot, review it on your LCD, making sure to turn on the histogram. Look at the edges of the histogram to determine if you’re losing detail in the shadows/highlights. For example, take a look at the image below and its corresponding histogram on the right:

waterfall photography

Notice how the histogram shows this image is severely underexposed: nearly all the pixels are black.

If you’re losing detail in shadows, then try a slower shutter speed and take another shot. And, if you’re losing detail in highlights, then try a faster shutter speed.

This step is a lot of trial and error. You may need to change camera settings between shots to get that perfect image you’re looking for.

If your shutter speed is proving too fast to create that silky water look, and you’ve already tried using a smaller aperture, then you might want to try popping on a neutral density filter to help you get a slower shutter speed.


Step 8: How to fix blown out highlights in Photoshop

waterfall photography

The most common problem you’ll experience with waterfall photos is blown out highlights. Even with the balanced and diffused light, you’ll probably still get a tiny blown-out spot on the waterfall somewhere: it’ll look like a giant white blob in the middle of your beautiful waterfall–yuck!

Luckily, there’s a simple way to get rid of this thing and give it texture like the rest of the waterfall. Here’s how to do it:

waterfall photography

Select the “Burn” tool (see above) and set the diameter to 100 pixels or so, hardness to about 15%, range to “highlights”, and exposure to about 8%. Then just hold down the mouse button and “draw” on the blown-out highlights.

Be careful not to go over the same spot twice, otherwise the effect of the burn will be doubled (usually resulting in dark gray water).

If the water turns too dark when doing this, then go back and try different settings (changing the “exposure” will have the most dramatic effect).

Here’s an example of what happened when I used this technique on the photo above:

waterfall photography

Conclusion

This tutorial is by no means a complete guide to photographing waterfalls, but it should be a good start. So, go find some waterfalls and start shooting!

  • http://vampa.org Alex Stomp

    Loving it! Great tut, especially the filter setup. Thanks

  • http://www.timowen.com.au Tim Owen

    looking forward to more tuts as descriptive as this :)

  • http://craigps.info/ Craigsnedeker

    Wonderful!

  • http://thechannelc.com Carolyn

    thanks Steve for another great tut.

  • http://twitter.com/digideth B. Moore

    Learned a couple new things today and for that I thank you!

  • http://www.serversidemagazine.com Gyorgy

    Nice tutorial. Keep up the good work!

  • begs

    That is exactly what i intended for doing this weekend. You’re a magician ;)
    Great tut. Thank you!

  • http://www.xitestudiomagazine.com Roberto XSM

    Simple but effective tutorial!

  • umerzafar

    quiet a handy tutorial.. thanks

  • http://phototrend.fr Damien

    Hey, nice tutorial, we made a similar one on Phototrend.fr : http://phototrend.fr/2009/04/mp-27-comment-photographier-une-cascade/
    It is in French, but there are so good tips and pictures inside :)

  • http://www.gunjankarun.com Gunjan Karun

    Wow, nice tut.
    I really loved the tip about fixing blown out highlights.

    Even I have a small tut on taking photos of waterfalls.
    You can read it on my blog at http://www.gunjankarun.com/?p=70

    Hope you find that useful too :)

  • http://inspiredbywordpress.co.uk Daniel Groves [Inspired By Wordpress]

    Shame I didn’t read this a few days ago when I was photographing waterfalls!

  • Mark Sinkinson

    Fantastic, hope this will be useful when I go to Niagara Falls this Christmas

  • Brett

    I must go out and buy filters now. This tut rocks.

  • http://www.stevendavisphoto.com Steven Davis

    nice tutorial. i would like to note also that you don’t need to use a 2 stop ND filter. u can use anything from a 1 stop to a 10 stop, or whatever else you want.

    in my mossbrae falls shot (http://www.flickr.com/photos/craniumdesigns/3724512854/) i use a 6 stop ND filter to achieve a 30 second exposure.

    u also dont need a shutter release, as you can often just use a 2 second timer instead.

    as far as shutter speed, it really depends on the feel you’re going for. most falls, you’ll wanna use a longer shutter speed of at least 1/10 second to capture that painted effect. however, if you’re shooting a really powerful waterfall, like niagra or iguazu, you wanna capture that power by using a FAST shutter.

    again, its all personal preference. just some criticisms and added points :)

    • http://photonaturalist.net Steve Berardi
      Author

      You’re right, you can definitely get by without a neutral density filter. Although it may help in some situations, I’ve found that a polarizing filter is usually enough. I like the 2-stop cause I’ve tried the 1-stop, but it never felt like enough to me, I’d rather just use a smaller aperture… For me the 2-stop has worked pretty well. I just got a 10-stop though, and I’m looking forward to trying it out, especially for oceanscapes..

      I like the shutter release cause it prevents me from touching the camera.. i have a superstition that it takes more than a few seconds for the vibration to die down, heheh.

      I agree with what you said about shutter speed too.. it really depends on the speed of the water.. but since it’s hard to calculate the exact speed of the water and correlate that with a proper shutter speed, I usually just experiment with a few test exposures and look at the histogram to help me make corrections.

      btw, just checked out your photos. amazing stuff!! I visited that Castle Lake at Mt Shasta in January and was depressed to find it frozen, haha.. didn’t do too much research about weather :)

      • http://www.stevendavisphoto.com Steven Davis

        yeah, i have a shutter release too, but i find i only use it when i have to capture something at an exact moment. things that don’t move, i don’t bother with it.

        thanks for the compliments on my stuff. i just started photography back in december and i’m loving it :)

    • http://www.spiveyphoto.com Mike Spivey

      Very good info. I would add that people should try a variety of shutter speeds. Certain waterfalls and cascades look great from 1/15 to one second. I call this “Angel Hair” water because it isn’t milky, it’s stringy.

  • http://www.stevendavisphoto.com Steven Davis

    also, if you have blown highlites, you CAN’T fix it. using the burn tool simply turns a flat, blown out white to a flat, blown out gray.

    the best way to shoot a waterfall is to make sure the historgram is as far to the right WITHOUT blowing out any highlites. USE YOUR HISTOGRAM, and watch for those little blinkies on your LCD to tell u when you have blown highlites. turn down your exposure time, shrink yoru aperture, or add more ND filters until u get the right exposure :)

    • http://photonaturalist.net Steve Berardi
      Author

      Good point. I think the gray does look better than the white blob though :)

      What I now do most of the time is take two exposures: one for the water that’s falling, and one for the surrounding area (i.e. rocks and moss, etc). then just blend those two in photoshop.. I thought that procedure was a little too complex for the sake of this tutorial though :)

      I think the burn method works well for those times you have just a small blown-out area.

    • Skellie
      Staff

      Great comments Steven – thanks for your tips!

  • http://www.violentsoap.com christopher

    I live in Oregon, USA. I’m gonna have to give this a go.

    • http://www.stevendavisphoto.com Steven Davis

      definitely hit up columbia river gorge then. great place to shoot waterfalls.

      • http://photonaturalist.net Steve Berardi
        Author

        ahh, the Columbia River Gorge is amazing :)

        just visited there in January..

  • http://freelancetraveler.com Adrian

    Just in time! Next week I’ll be visiting some natural parks in Croatia and Slovenia and there are plenty of waterfalls there. The polarizer was my best friend so far, so now I definitely have to get one for my new 72mm lens. I’ll have a look at the ND filter too.

  • http://photonaturalist.net Steve Berardi
    Author

    Thanks everyone for your nice comments! Glad you enjoyed the article :)

    btw, if you plan on getting a polarizing and/or ND filter, then I’d recommend getting a multicoated filter.. they’re about 2 or 3 times the price of regular filters, but they transmit more light by reducing reflections on the front of the glass…. (when you have too many reflections, you’ll get a washed out photo.)

    oh, and every single Hoya polarizing filter I’ve had has fallen apart.. $110+ down the drain.. I use B+W now and they work wonderfully.. and, I’m not affiliated with B+W in any way!! :)

    • http://www.stevendavisphoto.com Steven Davis

      yeah, i use a B+W CPOL (circular polarizer) too. cost me about $110 off amazon.

    • Duluoz

      Definitely invest in high quality filters such as B+W (my personal choice as well). It’s silly to spend $1k on a lens, then slap a $30 junk filter on it thats going to degrade the quality of your photos greatly. I would also recommend some filter wrenches for removing tighter filters as they apply even-pressure on the filter and can prevent binding and warping over time.

      • Skellie
        Staff

        Good tip Duluoz – cheap crappy filter + great lens isn’t a good combo.

  • http://www.akphotograph.com Mike Criss

    Nice work. I use a 3 stop ND filter and recently tried HDR with long exposure. Now I set up and take 3 exposures in AV mode. Turned out fairly well.
    http://www.akphotograph.com/Alaska%20Blog/?p=730

  • http://www.sukoon-bh.comvb منتديات سكون البحرين

    this is wonderful tutorial .. i read it 3 times and get a fantastic results and sure i put a
    copy of this lesson on my site here

    http://www.sukoon-bh.com\vb

  • http://www.paddoswam.nl/ Tom

    Am I the only one that thinks these “waterfalls” look more like smudges smoke trails this way? I think it’s the worst way of taking a waterfall photograph, you could just as well get a cheap cheesy render…

  • Diane Slaunwhite

    Excellent. I am taking a group of photographers to photograph waterfalls in a couple of weeks in Cape Breton and I think the newbies in the group will really get a lot of tips from this tut. Thanks.

  • Ben

    I like taking ultra fast shutter speed pictures of waterfalls. They look so magnificent went put in pause.

  • Nathan vD

    Although I didn’t find this particularly useful (I’ve already done a bit of this stuff) Its great to see a tutorial that could actually be useful and tells you HOW to take the photo not just useless dribble .

  • http://www.drecart.com drec

    Steve, I’m with you on the expose for the shadows side and another for the highlights in tricky lighting conditions. ND filters can be good, depends on the surroundings and if you’ll get that motion/blur of plants. My tip? Save up and buy some Graduated ND filters and a filter holder kit.

  • http://www.willheyphotography.com Adrian Spencer

    Love it, good filter advice.

  • http://www.photofidelity.com Daniel Fealko

    @Tom – “Am I the only one that thinks these “waterfalls” look more like smudges smoke trails this way?”

    No, you’re not the only one who thinks this approach produces unrealistic looking waterfall photos. That’s why I tried a different approach and wrote about it on my blog. Check out A Novel Way to Capture Waterfalls.

    I have mixed feelings about using slower shutter speeds to capture flowing water. It can look nice when done right. Unfortunately, too many overdo the effect, and it can come out not looking anything like water. However, that too doesn’t really matter as long as the photographer enjoys the photo.

  • Artrina

    Daniel and Tom – THANK YOU for letting me know that I’m not alone in not liking the water in pix like this! I usually like everything in pix like this except the way the water flows. When I see water like this, I think that it is over processed because I have NEVER seen water that looks fuzzy like it does in pix like this. To each his own taste with pix, but, I prefer scenes taken in nature to look as realistic as possible.

  • http://craigps.info CraigSnedeker
  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/broeckxsven/ sven
  • http://wet-photo.blogspot.com/ WET

    The ND filters are really a must-have! Especially in winter. I tried some long exposure shooting today in the forest and without a ND filter it would have been almost impossible to get more than 2 seconds of exposure. But i really need at least a 3 stop filter. 1 stop just isn’t enough :-(

    PS: Thanks for the tip about the overcast days! I never thought about this factor.

  • http://www.think360studio.com/ Taylor

    I am impressed, perfect :)

  • Corker2

    I have just recently came across your site here on the Internet, and started reading on some of your very informative tutorials. One of them that I enjoyed was how to photograph waterfalls.

    I have often seen Images taken by other photographers and wondering just how they get the falls to look as they do. Now I know. I’m going to try and do what I’ve read and see what comes out.

    Thanks for helping me out.
    Corker2

  • http://www.santorini-photographer.com Santorini Photographer

    Steve, great tutorial thank you, not just for amateur photographers.

  • http://www.tayvinknightphoto.com Dallas commercial photographer

    Thanks for the tutorial. My pics never turn out like yours. I’ll try again.