Achieve Beautiful Landscape Photos with a Neutral Density Filter

Final Product What You'll Be Creating

This entry is part 2 of 14 in the Landscapes Session
« PreviousNext »

One of the most useful pieces of kit that you can own is a set of Neutral Density Graduated Filters. They can rescue a landscape image which would otherwise be spoilt by washed out skies or dark foregrounds. A large percentage of landscape images will always have a contrast between these two areas and it is therefore essential to have, and to know how to use, these useful filters.


1. Introduction

Neutral density graduated filters (ND Grads) can make a really dramatic difference to your landscape photography. Images captured on film or digitally cannot record the same range of brightness as the human eye, leading to disappointing results. By using ND Grads, you can control the contrast between a light sky and dark foreground, allowing the camera’s sensor to record the detail in both these areas. They can rescue a landscape image which would otherwise be spoilt by washed out skies or dark foregrounds.


2. The Problem

If you think of light as a series of stops, digital cameras can only see about 7 stops in total from black to white, whereas the human eye can see approximately 20. On a bright day, to obtain the subtle detail in both the foreground and the sky requires a greater number of stops than the camera’s sensor can capture. Without a filter to bring down the brightness of the sky, you have to choose whether you are going to meter for colour in the sky or to have detail in the foreground. If you choose to have colour in the sky, you will find that everything in the foreground becomes a silhouette. If you choose to have detail in the foreground, the sky will become bland and washed out. Neither of these outcomes is ideal.

neutral density filter landscape photography

Image 2: Image metered for sky – foreground dark and lacking in detail

neutral density filter landscape photography

Image 3: Image metered for foreground – sky burnt out


3. The Solution

An ND Grad is a filter that attaches to the front of your camera’s lens. It is graduated 50/50 in colour starting from dark grey at one end to clear at the other. It is given a number which tells you exactly how much it is going to reduce the brightness by.

Image 4: Lee Hard Edge Neutral Density Graduated Filters from left to right – 1, 2 and 3 stop

neutral density filter landscape photography

ND Grads usually come in one-stop increments with the most popular being 1-stop, 2-stop and 3-stop. However, it is also possible to obtain 4-stop and 5-stop filters. These numbers tell you exactly how many stops of light they are going to reduce the brightness by. A 2-stop ND Grad will let one quarter of the light through, a 3-stop one eighth of the light through etc… To complicate matters a little, they are not named in stops but as shown in the list below.

Naming Standards for the LEE filter system

ND 0.31 stop
ND 0.62 stop
ND 0.93 stop

Naming Standards for the COKIN filter system P Series

P121L1 stop
P121M2 stop
P121S3 stop

By positioning the dark part of the ND Grad against the sky, you can reduce the amount of light that reaches the sensor and therefore the number of stops in the image. In the mid area, this filter gradually changes from dark to clear making the effect look natural. Because the dark part of the filter covers the bright sky, it helps to reduce it’s brightness, bringing the number of stops in the image closer to the range that it is possible to capture with your digital camera.

The filters also come in hard and soft edged versions. I like to use the hard edge versions as there is always quite a distinct difference between the lighter skies and darker foregrounds in the Lake District. Generally speaking, I have noticed that the difference is always around 2 stops. The hard edged versions are also best when the horizon is perfectly straight such as a seascape with no interruptions. You can then align them perfectly with the horizon.


4. The Main Players

The main players in the field are Cokin and Lee. I started off with Cokin ND Grads which are roughly one-third the price of Lee. I used these quite happily for many years. When I turned professional and started using a fullframe Canon EOS 5D and 5D MK11, I moved to the Lee system because of their higher quality which I have found to give more consistent results.

Both Lee and Cokin filters are used with a filter holder that screws on to the front of your camera’s lens via an adapter ring. The ring required depends on the thread of your lens so you may need more than one adaptor if you use several lenses.

Lee manufactures two sets of ND Grads. One set, for use with wide-angle lenses, has a soft transition area between the dark and clear areas of the filter. The other set, for use with standard and telephoto lenses, has a hard transition area. The Lee filters are also much larger than the Cokin ones (6″ x 4″ as against 2.5″ x 2.5″) and ideal if you own lenses that have a large front diameter. This reduces the chance of vignetting when you use them (i.e. corners of the image going dark). You can also purchase wide angle adapter rings for a wide angle lens. This wide angle adapter also helps to avoid the problem of vignetting.

neutral density filter landscape photography


5. How to Position Your ND Grad

ND Grads need to be positioned very carefully to get the best effect. They need to be slid up and down in the filter holder with the transition from clear to dark falling accurately on the horizon or the light sky where you want to obtain a correct exposure. This is easier to do if your camera is placed securely on a tripod. To help position your ND Grad, you can set your shooting aperture and hold down your camera’s depth-of-field preview button if it has one. Although the viewfinder will be dark, it will show the transition more clearly. Where your image includes mountains etc, you still need to make sure that the light sky either side of the mountain is still covered by the lower part of the graduated filter. I know part of the summit of the mountain will also be covered by a part of the filter but this hardly affects the image.

Once in position, don’t forget to rotate the holder if you change from shooting from landscape to portrait. It’s easy to forget this and any shots taken like this will be ruined.

neutral density filter landscape photography

Image 6: Here you can see the Lee Filter positioned correctly in the holder


6. Metering Your Shot

Step 1: The first thing you need to do is to set your camera onto aperture priority (AV) at f11 which, as mentioned in my previous tutorial on hyperfocal distance, is the optimum f-setting for landscape photography to achieve maximum sharpness throughout the whole of the image.

Step 2: Without your ND Grad in place, take a spot-meter reading with the foreground filling the whole of the frame. Remember with spot metering around 3% of the middle of the sensor will be checked to calculate the shutter speed. This means you can be very accurate to meter over the dark foreground area.

Step 3: Repeat step 2 with the light sky filling the whole of the frame.

Step 4: The difference between these two readings indicates the strength of filter you need. Use a 0.3 ND grad if the difference is 1-stop, a 0.6 ND grad if its 2-stops and a 0.9 grad if it’s a 3-stop difference. Most filter holders have two slots so if the difference is more than 3 stops then you can use both slots to increase the ND grad capacity.

Step 5: Attach the correct ND Grad and take your shot using the spot-meter reading that you took for the foreground. Because the foreground of the image will be shot through the clear part of the graduated filter, using the metered shutter speed will ensure a perfect exposure for that part of the image.


7. Taking My Image

This image was taken at Blea Tarn, Little Langdale in the English Lake District. It had rained heavily throughoutthe day but in the late afternoon some blue patches started to appear in amongst the grey and overcast skies. However, the light was still far from what I would have preferred it to be.

When taking my image, I spot-metered my shots as described above and found that there was about a 2-Stop difference between the light sky and the dark foreground. The metered details are as follows:-

  • ISO 100 on Aperture Priority at F11
  • Foreground was spot metered at 1/13th of a second
  • Background was spot metered at 1/50th of a second

neutral density filter landscape photography

Image 7: 1-Stop ND Grad (0.3) used on Manual at 100 ISO, F11 and at 1/13th of a second.

As you can see, some definition has started to appear in the sky but this is still slightly over-exposed. The foreground is perfectly exposed as I used the shutter speed that I obtained for the foreground when the image was spot-metered.

neutral density filter landscape photography

Image 8: 2-Stop ND Grad (0.6) used on Manual at 100 ISO, F11 and at 1/13th of a second.

In this image, I used the correct strength ND Grad with the result that correct exposure has been obtained throughout the image.

neutral density filter landscape photography

Image 9: 3-Stop ND Grad (0.9) used on Manual at 100 ISO, F11 and at 1/13th of a second.

Here the sky has become slightly under-exposed but this is personal choice. Some photographers will prefer the more dramatic sky which using this 3-Stop ND Grad has given.


8. Conclusion

I think you can see that, for what is a modest outlay, a set of ND Graduated Filters is a ‘must have’ part of your photography kit. You would see a big improvement in your landscape images immediately, and the days when you thought that the sky was too flat for photography will be a thing of the past.

  • http://www.simonbolz.com Simon

    Excellent article. And a very nice technique for landscape photography. Some people might prefer using HDR techniques and post production but I really like the method you describe!

    • http://www.stevendavisphoto.com Steven Davis

      this kind of method looks much more realistic and natural than HDR. HDR has it’s place, and i do plenty of it myself, but in general I prefer this kinda of situation for landscape photography.

      • http://www.shinyphoto.co.uk/ Tim

        HDR has the advantage of being feasible when the transition is not a straight line, and can be done tastefully, at least :)

  • Lorenzo Gallardo

    beautiful guide on ND grads. :) dying to get one real soon. right now i’m making do with HDR treatment. :) awesome! thanks for sharing.

  • http://photographyforsoul.com Can Berkol

    High quality article! I love it.

  • http://www.freephotoresources.com Barry

    Nice post, well explained!

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/jcwighton/ Jacob

    Thanks heaps for this Tutorial. There is a guy I know who uses ND-Grads to take some of the most amazing sunrise photos I have ever seen. Recently I have been considering looking in to them but didn’t know where to start. This couldn’t have been better for me. Thanks heaps!

  • http://www.swanydesign.com Swany

    great tutorial! …using filters on your camera out in the field instead of relying on photoshop when you come home is so much more rewarding..

    • http://www.stevendavisphoto.com Steven Davis

      shooting AEB in the field and not worrying about a filter, allows u to take many more comps in the field, when ur light is changing, and u dont have the luxury of spending a lot of time on one comp. i prefer to spend time behind the computer when i DO have the time.

      • http://www.swanydesign.com Swany

        awesome i’ll just become a monkey and push buttons then

        • http://www.swanydesign.com Swany

          that wasn’t ment to be mean, i’m just naturally a sarcastic B****

          sometimes i can’t help myself…

          • Alex

            A professor of mine often spoke of “trained monkeys” taught to use a computer but that have no artistic eye or talent.

            Essentially, though, the difference can be seen in final products, and inherently has to do with how tools are used instead of what tools are used.

            Filter vs Post Production is an option of which tools to use. Both can yield “trained monkey” images and both can yield professional photographic images. The difference happens in the mind and work of the artist. Do not make the mistake of thinking your tools, no matter what they are or what they cost, will make your work better.

      • http://www.timparkin.co.uk Tim Parkin

        You could just use a two stop soft grad for all shots with sky. This will effectively extend your dynamic range and you can tweak the look in your computer later.

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/caiolopez Caio

    You could have mentioned that those NDs were GRADUATED in the title.
    I thought you were doing some long exposure shots or something. Great Tut anyway.

  • http://www.ricardofilipe.com Ricardo Magalhães

    I’m with Caio, I was expecting to see some insight about regular ND filters. The only problem (if you wanna call it that) of this particular method, well, is price itself. Unless you know for sure what to do with them and that you’re really making the most of them, this method hardly pays itself over zero cost HDR.

    You need a filter (maybe more than one), the filter holder, and possibly a few adapter rings to fit your lenses. That doesn’t turn out cheap. (and I’m talking to readers here, of course ;) )

    For those who are seriously interested in this technique, I would suggest some “foreplay” work with a regular single sized filter, or maybe some experience with normal ND filters. Even the consideration of HDR, if you shoot landscape only now and then. But if the material is no problem, then by all means go ahead! :)

    Thanks for the tutorial!

  • http://www.stevendavisphoto.com Steven Davis

    nice. i usually just take 2 exposures and then blend them in photoshop, as it allows u much more flexibility than just a straight line gradient, but GND’s are essential when u have movement and u need to capture it in one shot.

  • http://www.mywedding.ie wedding photographer galway

    nice little tut. a bit basic but still short and sweet!

  • http://www.cashbackprinting.com Tom

    Nice tut. Is there a way to do something similar, but instead when there are mountain ranges with extremely bright areas and dark shadows? (I’m guessing it would most likely require photoshop)

  • Bryan

    Seems like a good alternative to natural-looking HDR, thanks for sharing :-)

  • http://www.bloggerzbible.blogspot.com/ Bloggerzbible

    Nice tutorial

  • http://www.gregveit.com Greg Goodale

    I use cheaper filter systems and I suffer for it. A 16mm lens gets major vignetting so you end up with a roughly square frame. That’s a lot of holder in the frame. Also, shooting into strong light I get reflections all over the place as the cheap filters aren’t coated.

  • Sal Pedi

    I”ve just purchased the Lee DSLR Filter starter kit. I comes with two (2) filters.
    One is a ND 0.6 Grad Hard filter and the other is a ProGlass ND 0.6 Standard filter.

    And, sad to say that I have no idea of how to use these filters.
    I do know that I have to take a meter reading of the “Backround” and the
    “Foreground”, but, how do I determine the proper shutter speed? And, do you
    focus BEFORE putting the filter on the camera?..

    • http://www.martinlawrencephotography.com Martin Lawrence
      Author

      Hi Sal

      The Lee ND 0.6 Grad Hard filter is a 2 ‘stop’ filter. When shooting landscapes I always use aperature F11 as this gives me maximum depth of field without any distortion. Therefore set your camera to AV ‘aperature priority’ and get your shutter speeds for both background and foreground. Generally speaking your foreground will be a slower shutter speed than for the lighter background. Work out the difference between the 2 shutter speeds ie the difference between a 1/30 and 1/125 is 2 stops and use the appropriate filter. Set your camera to manual on F11 and use the shutter speed you obtained when metering for the foreground as this will be shot through the clear part of the filter. You can then re-compose the shot, focus and take the image.

      Hope this helps.

      Martin

  • http://gallopinggreen.com Stephen

    Well written tutorial for a subject that can be prone to confuse – kudos!

  • http://www.barryjohnphotography.com Barry John

    nice article I too prefer the Grad filter to post processing in CS4

  • http://roteague.wordpress.com Robert

    Good article, I’ve advocated the use of these filters for years. However, I still very much prefer film.

  • joani barnett

    Wow fantastic! May I get yr permission to paint this?

  • http://moccasverden.blogspot.com/ mocca

    Just what I have been looking for!!! Thanks for a great tutorial – I loved it!

  • Michael

    As an amateur, I was playing with a Cokin P-series on a 77mm Nikon 12-24mm DX lens (cropped sensor). I love the natural feel of modifying the light rather than computer…except I made one crucial mistake.

    The ace in the hole in your tutorial above is the planned metering for the foreground. I totally did not think of this in my tests and you explained it beautifully by locking the ISO and aperture to clearly show the stop calculation. So obvious, but not something that pops into a beginners mind when out in the field.

    Also, vignetting is solved partially buying the slim Cokin holder, but drawback is only one slot. Still V creeps in at 12mm unfortunately. I have read of others cutting the larger holder to remove the V.

    Thanks and I look forward to reading more of your site!

  • steve

    Ive never understood grads or how to use them, thanks for posting an informative and easy to understand tutorial and addditional points for the photographic examples.

    Steve

  • Michael

    Have just found out about your site and am most impressed with the easily understood tutorials. I have a Canon G9 which has a ND filter would this have the same effect as the ones written about, I do not think it is graduated.

  • Luke B

    Great tutorial. HDR is fine if done tastefully but very few photographers can pull it off without their work being instantly recognizable as such (to the trained eye). Personally, I like using ND Grads but I’d suggest looking at a few shots on Flickr to help decide which look you like best. Then again, why not become proficient in both?