Quick Tip: The Real Secret to Avoiding Noise

Quick Tip: The Real Secret to Avoiding Noise

Noise is something that drives many photographes wild. In the pursuit of technical excellence, many shooters attempt to eliminate the presence of what I refer to as the digital era’s equivalent of grain. Photographers chase many different solutions to eliminate grain, but my experience editing has shown that many photographers are missing the big secret.

First of all, let’s make sure that you know what the term “noise” refers to in the photography world. Noise rears its head as a “graininess” in the image, with tiny dots characterizing “noisy” areas. Solid colored areas can look speckled or muddy.


The image you see here is a great example of noise in a photo. Exposed at night with a high ISO setting, noise is apparent in a 100% crop of the sky.

Noise can be caused (and reduced) by a number of different factors. The setting most shooters consider when thinking of noise is ISO, or a camera’s sensitivity to light. Indeed, there is a definite relationship between noise and ISO – as ISO is increased (providing higher sensitivity to light) so too does the amount of noise present in a photo. With modern cameras, high ISO’s are more usable than ever, but increasing ISO still has the potential to increase noise.

Noise can be decreased with software such as Lightroom or Photoshop, or decreased by using the lower ISO setting as discussed above. Still, many photographers miss the most effective way to avoid noise to begin with. I discovered this issue while doing some editing for a friend of mine. He had shot his images at a low ISO, purposefully underexposing the photo with the intentions of bringing it back into proper exposure in Adobe Lightroom.

In reality, his technique was flawed; the most important part of avoiding noise is to properly expose within camera. I know, it seems like a basic piece of advice, but take a look at these images samples to illustrate the difference between getting an exposure right in the camera, and artificially increasing it in post production. The net effect of doing so increases the noise in the final image.


I shot this image test to illustrate the importance of getting your settings right in camera. On my Canon 5D Mark II, I shot two images: one photo at ISO 6400, and another at ISO 1600. The ISO 1600 was two stops underexposed, and I “added back” these two stops in Lightroom. As you can see, in the photo at right (the “fake 6400″ shot), the noise levels are much higher than they would’ve been if it had been properly exposed at the higher ISO.

As you can see, having a low ISO setting means almost nothing if we end up adjusting the exposure heavily. If a photo is made at ISO 100 and requires two stops of exposure adjustment in post, we will have introduced a lot more noise than if we had exposed the initial image at ISO 400 (a two stop sensitivity increase).

Unfortunately, I’m afraid that there are photographers out there who aren’t aware of this idea. If you’re ever in a shooting situation where you’re afraid to bump the ISO, don’t hesitate and leave a photo underexposed. The net effect will be a greater amount of image noise.

From the above image tests, it’s not hard to see that one of the biggest techniques in reducing noise is to properly expose the image. Unfortunately, this simple piece of advice is too frequently forgotten and overlooked in the “noise wars”. If too much exposure adjustment is required in the editing phase, noise is going to become apparent regardless of the ISO setting chosen within the camera.

  • Sam Cox

    Good, usable advice. Thanks for sharing this tip, Andrew.

  • http://stucorlett.com Stuart

    This is a really overlooked issue by many photographers because its so easy to “fix it in post”. Digital media is a lot more sensitive than film, and requires more accuracy in the original capture…. unless of course you like noise!

  • Jose Antonio

    Thanks a lot for the information!

  • Akanksha

    OK great right exposure is the BIG secret but how about sharing tips for good exposure in dark situation where increasing the ISO seems the only solution!

    • Wayne G

      Use a tripod…

  • Ben

    I wonder about people who are reliant on the “post”. I’m a super amateur, but it seems to me that, as a photographer, you’d want to get the “perfect” exposure the first time. That’s not to say there’s no place for post processing, but it seems that “post” is becoming more important (or relied upon) than the actual shooting.

  • 9inchnail

    I’m wondering if you actually realize why people intentionally underexpose. They’re not doing it for fun, they’re doing it to get faster shutter speeds. No one in their right mind would set the ISO to 400 and underexpose two stops if they can just set their ISO to 1600. You only use that technique if your maximum ISO is still not enough to get the shot. My camera’s maximum is ISO 1600, if that’s not enough to enable me to shoot handheld, I have to go with the intentional underexposure.

    • http://andrewchildress.com Andrew Childress
      Author

      Hi there, thanks a lot for the feedback. You raise a great point – if your’e locked into a fairly low top ISO, that’s really your only choice. However, the article was aimed at those who think that adding exposure in post is a better approach. You’ve definitely given me something good to think about! Cheers!

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/45313040@N08/ Matthias

    I never thought about post processing like this, but so far I prefered low iso + long exposure, this made me second guess that too, since the long exposure could create noise too… will try that tonight

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/45313040@N08/ Matthias

    So, thank you for the idea, now I know, that with my EOS 1000D low ISO with high exposure creates less noise than high iso with low exposure :)

  • Theo

    Or just use a full frame dslr and your noise will dissapear ;) .

  • Joe Rasmussen

    I have had these thoughts myself. Underexposure changes the amount of light seen by the sensor, this then means that “gain” needs to be added later. Noise is a function of gain in all forms of signal processing, whether it be audio or photons changed into an equivalent electronic signal.

    Better to expose properly even if ISO needs to be set higher, at least that will maximise the light falling on the sensor. If we, as the example shows, we underexpose by two stops (less light on the sensor), then
    4x gain is required that would otherwise not be, so guess what, the noise get amplified four times as well. And that is what the example above.

    I am about to make a point that many just don’t get, and both analog and digital engineers. The output of the sensor is an analog signal.

    The question then comes, how can that be?

    Because it is an analog signal(s) that represents digital data.

    Noise is all analog.

    Digital data is only content – as something that can be stored, and we think of course as binary. But when that content has to be processed, or if you like, is on the move – then it has to be converted to signal
    that are basically voltages and currents – that is entirely analog.

    That just helps to explain so many things. There is no such a thing as a digital signal, but rather we have analog signal(s) that carries digital content.

    Noise is an interesting beast with many faces.

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/broeckxsven/ Sven

    There are some good and basic tips in this article, but for me the big secret to avoiding noise is another thing (at least in landscape photography)…

    ‘the most important part of avoiding noise is to properly expose within camera’ isn’t correct for me, you should overexpose your picture a bit (EXPOSING TO THE RIGHT) and then with post processing you bring the exposure back to the correct exposure, if you do that, your shadows will have more details and then you will have less noise…

    Another less important thing to reduce noice is the temperature, for example, if you are shooting a snow landscape. you must let your camera cool down to the outdoor temperature and then shoot your picture.

  • vp

    What if I shoot raw intentionally underexposing the image and then adjusting it @ lightroom/photshop?

  • David Hodgson

    Two more ways to reduce noise is to have faster a lens an f 1.2 lens is 2 stops faster than a f 2.8 or 200 ASA rather than 800 ASA A tripod with you can also help . As can the ability to hand hold at a lower shutter speed. I am always amassed at the way people hold their camera you would think that they had never read the manuel.