Film Is Alive and Well: Tips, Cameras, and Beginners Advice
basix

Film Is Alive and Well: Tips, Cameras, and Beginners Advice

This entry is part 1 of 14 in the Film Photography Session
Next »

When I first got into photography almost 20 years ago, film was the de facto standard and, obviously, the only standard. For over a hundred years film was the only option. The greatest names in photography all shot film; I’m sure you’ve heard of Ansel Adams.

Some of the most inspiring, well-known photographs ever produced were shot by famous photographers—so why do all the modern-day pros shoot digital if all the greats shot film? The answer is quite simple: convenience and cost.


If Film Is So Great, Why Do We Shoot Digital?

I would like to preface this tutorial by saying that I make the majority of my income from shooting digital. Film versus digital is a very controversial subject and the point of this tutorial is not to claim that one is better than the other, but rather to provide the reader a better understanding of film, and what it can do for them today, even in a digital world.

The digital format…

  1. Allows you to review your work after every single shot, from the camera, without having to wait for film to be developed.
  2. Is easily transferable in digital format from one computer to the next, or from one mobile phone to another, or from one email box to another.
  3. Costs less in the long run to print because there are no developing costs.
  4. Is more versatile because the digital sensor is able to change ISO on the fly.
  5. Does not expire like film does.

I could go on. The simple fact is that digital simply makes sense for the modern 35mm photographer and certainly for the weekend hobbyist. There are no messy chemicals to deal with, you’re not required to sit in a dark room for hours on end to see if your film [properly] developed, and you only need a memory card or two instead of roll after roll of film.


If Digital Is King, Why Are You Recommending Film?

If you are interested in becoming a photographer, starting out can be very expensive. Granted, if you buy used equipment you can save a lot of money. But even used, a digital SLR (DSLR) can run you a few hundred dollars whereas a mint condition film SLR will cost less than $100.

Even the most expensive, top of the line, professional film SLR’s on the used market go for a couple hundred bucks. On the other hand, top of the line DSLR’s go for thousands, even well used. Start-up cost is one of the toughest hurdles to overcome when getting into photography and this is where film can save you a bundle while getting your feet wet in the world of photography.

The second reason I recommend film to beginners is that it’s a more immersive way to learn about the relationship between aperture, ISO and shutter speed. You also have to be more cognizant of your surroundings and available light when shooting film. I have to admit, I’m a little grumpy knowing that many modern photographers never touched or even wanted to try their hand at film; they’re robbing themselves of a truly wonderful experience that I believe can take them to a whole other level.

The digital format allows one to be very sloppy, especially if you’re shooting in digital RAW format. You’re able to over or underexpose and fix it in post rather than doing it right in the first place. Heck, worrying about white-balance seems to be a thing of the past; a simple eye-dropper tool fixes everything for you in post! Learning on film teaches you to truly care about your surroundings while getting intimately familiar with your camera and all of its little quirks.

If you thought my reasons for shooting film were subjective, my final reasons are even more so; but hear me out. In my opinion, black and white photography has yet to be reproduced in digital format to echo the beautiful black and white film formats that are still available today.

It’s hard to explain; maybe it’s the film grain versus digital grain, maybe it’s the seemingly infinite tones that black and white film can produce or maybe it’s a combination of a lot of different elements aligning to “make it happen”. All I know is that I have yet to see consistent results from digital black and white prints that are as astoundingly gorgeous as examples from countless black and white prints that I have seen throughout my life. Obviously, this is subjective, but there you have it.

Canon EOS 630 – Kodak T-MAX400 B&W Film


Okay Fine, Where Do I Start?

Where else? The camera! There have been so many makes, models and formats of cameras over the years that it would be silly to try and review them all. And I don’t want to “fake it”, I’m not going to scour the internet looking for info on camera systems that I know nothing about. I believe that would only dilute my information and rob you of truly useful, real-world experience. My goal is to provide some of what I know so that you can make an informed decision when you go on the hunt for your own film camera.

In this article, I will not address medium or large format film cameras since I could write a book on that topic alone. Not to mention, I wouldn’t be saving you any money by recommending the medium/large format route anyway. Instead, I’ll start with Canon’s EOS systems, I’ll continue with a short glimpse into rangefinders and finish up with film recommendations.

I apologize ahead of time for those interested in Nikon or other manufacturers. I have far more experience with Canon, but some of these same principles should apply to other systems and the film recommendations should work across the board.

Let’s get started!


Canon EOS Elan

Models Include:

Elan
Elan II(e)
Elan 7(e)(n)(ne)

Up For Review: Elan IIe

The Canon EOS Elan IIe is a steal when you compare the price to performance ratio. While a 1v is a wonderful (and legendary) film SLR, even now a good copy is being sold for several hundred dollars and that might be a bit much to invest on a used film camera when you’re first starting out, especially since the Elan is so cheap and provides many of the same functions.

The Elan is also very easy to find in online auctions. It uses typical 35mm film and has the modern EF lens mount (versus the older, discontinued FD lens mount). I would highly recommend buying one that comes with a battery grip if you want to use AA batteries, the body itself will only take the more expensive 2CR5 batteries.

Why?

  1. Cost. ($20-$50)
  2. Performance and Features
  3. Ergonomics
  4. Pro Features

Where?

  1. eBay
  2. Buy/Sell sections on Camera Forums
  3. Local Camera Shops
  4. Yard Sales

Features

  1. Silent Film Operation (Elan was the first SLR with near-silent operation)
  2. Simultaneous AF/MF with USM lenses
  3. A large thumb wheel for control
  4. High speed flash sync
  5. Basically the first “auto everything” SLR with just about every professional control you could ask for in a film SLR

Notes

  1. No AE Lock
  2. Not weather sealed (although I’ve had mine in the rain plenty of times)
  3. Known for underexposing when in difficult, mixed lighting situations if using lower ISO film (50,100)
  4. Make sure to buy one that comes with the grip so you can use AA batteries

Photo Sample


Canon EOS 600-Series

Models Include:

EOS 650
EOS 620
EOS 630

Up For Review: EOS 630

The reason I’m recommending the 600 series of cameras is that they’re extremely cheap, built like tanks, and can still be found quite easily. This series was among the first to rely on electronic focusing by communication between the on-board microprocessor and auto-focusing motors in EF lenses. The AF system out-performed anything else at the time.

The EOS 630 was the latest from the 600 line. It had the fastest processor which resulted in faster AF, had interchangeable viewing screens, had an illuminated LCD and could use databacks. It was also all metal construction; it has held up amazingly well over the years.

If I had a gripe, the biggest would be that it’s a pain to do manual metering because of the multiple button operations required to accomplish it. The camera is also not the most comfortable to hold in your hands in comparison with other EOS systems.

Why?

  1. Cost. ($5-$50)
  2. Performance and Features
  3. Build Quality
  4. Pro Features

Where?

  1. eBay
  2. Buy/Sell sections on Camera Forums
  3. Local Camera Shops
  4. Yard Sales

Features

  1. Modern AF
  2. Interchangeable viewing screens
  3. Illuminated LCD
  4. Databack Compatible
  5. Metal construction

Notes

  1. Ergonomics not the best
  2. Multiple button presses for some operations

Photo Sample


Canon EOS Rebel Series

Models Include:

Rebel SII
Rebel X/XS
Rebel G
Rebel 2000
Rebel K2
Rebel Ti/T2

Up For Review: Rebel G

The Rebel series is probably the one you know as the “Andre Agassi camera”. The famous tennis player was hired by Canon to market their line of Rebel cameras throughout the 90′s and 2000′s. It was one of the most successful, mass-produced lines that Canon ever made (and continues that course with the digital Rebel today).

I’m recommending this camera because it costs next to nothing; I’ve seriously witnessed people give them away. That doesn’t mean there’s anything wrong with them, on the contrary! They’re quite capable with some pro-level features in a very light and compact package.

The reason they’re so cheap is that there were so many of them made and since they were never a “professional” camera, they were not that expensive, even when new. Don’t expect a lot of pro-features and amazing build quality, however.

If you want to spend next to nothing on a body just to get the experience of shooting and developing film, this is your camera.

Why?

  1. Cost. ($5-$30)
  2. Size and Weight
  3. Easy to find

Where?

  1. eBay
  2. Buy/Sell sections on Camera Forums
  3. Local Camera Shops
  4. Yard Sales

Features

  1. Very compact and lightweight (half the weight of the Elan II and 630)
  2. Accepts all modern EF lenses
  3. Full meter scale in the viewfinder at all times, even in metered-manual mode

Notes

  1. Lacks DOF preview
  2. Viewfinder is cramped
  3. Built-in flash is weak
  4. Plastic lens mount rather than metal
  5. You only have one control to set both shutter speed and aperture, so manual mode metering is more difficult than it should be.

Photo Sample


The Rangefinder

What the heck is a rangefinder? It’s a camera fitted with a rangefinder, duh! For all intents and purposes, a rangefinder is a method of focusing. Most rangefinders show two images of a subject; when you turn a focus wheel, one of the images moves until it is lined up with the other image and that’s how you know it’s in focus. Personally, I really enjoy this method of focusing. Rangefinders are popular because of the following:

  1. Very compact
  2. No moving mirror
  3. Quiet operation
  4. “Both eyes open” shooting

Rangefinders offer a unique shooting experience in that you’re not looking through the lens like you do with an SLR. It’s sort of like shooting through a modern point-n-shoot. Because the viewfinder is off to the side, you can leave both eyes open while looking through the viewfinder to survey your scene as you’re shooting. This makes the rangefinder very popular amongst urban and photojournalist photographers.

If you’ve researched rangefinders at any level, you’ve probably run across mention of Leica, they are the bad boys in the realm of rangefinders, the top of the pack. Unfortunately, that means they’re also insanely expensive.

I’ve had experience with several rangefinders over the years, but I always go back to my Canon QL-17 GIII. I love the photos that come out of this thing, especially black and whites. It is often referred to as the “poor man’s Leica” because the lens quality was able to produce incredible photos for the price.

Canon Canonet QL-17 GIII

You can find them on used camera forums and eBay for $20-$30. The reason you can find them so cheap is that the light seals are often shot, sometimes the aperture blades are frozen and the shutter speed may be off.

If you are lucky enough to find one that only needs the light seals replaced, it’s a relatively easy and cheap fix (we’re talking $12-$15 for the new seals) if you do the repair yourself.

Light Seal Replacement on my Canon Canonet QL-17 GIII

Photo Sample

Canon Canonet QL-17 GII – Kodak B&W T-MAX400


You’ve Convinced Me, So What About Film?

First and foremost, find a reputable local camera lab and give them a call. They’ll tell you what kind of film they’re able to handle as well as what they can print and what sort of print medium they can print on.

Don’t be shy about admitting you’re a film beginner. In fact, I encourage it. Otherwise, they’ll assume you know what you’re doing and you may miss out on some very important lessons while working with your photo lab. After you’ve developed your first couple of rolls, feel free to see if there are other services that are cheaper (including online) if you’re so inclined.

I recommend your local camera shop because I’m a believer in supporting your local industry. And, as I eluded to, you can learn a lot by asking questions and dealing with your lab in person.

Negative and Slide Film

Generally speaking, there are two types of film; slide film and negative film. I’m going to focus on negative film, it’s the easiest (and cheapest) to work with. As you progress, you may want to dabble with slide film as it can technically produce better prints than negatives can and slide longevity is much greater than negatives (which start to deteriorate well within a decade).

Film Speed

Next up is film speed. ISO speeds in digital cameras came from the ISO film rating system and the same principles apply. The larger the ISO number, the less light you’ll need to expose your scene on the film negative.

What I would recommend is starting with an ISO400 film (or thereabouts) so that you have a little more latitude with available light. Any higher and you’ll really start to see a lot of film grain and any lower will require sunlight or lots of interior light, more than a typically lit room in your house will provide.

Storage

You may have heard that some people store batteries in their refrigerator. Well, I have no idea if that does anything for batteries or not, but it certainly does for film. I store all of my film in the fridge. Why? Film is made of chemicals that start to break down as heat is introduced. The warmer it gets, the faster it deteriorates.

If you keep your film cold, the process is slowed, although never completely stopped. It doesn’t matter whether you keep your film in the fridge or the freezer, there are no ill effects to film if you freeze and defrost it. However, I keep mine in the fridge so that I can use it immediately instead of waiting for it to thaw.

Types

Here’s some film that I’ve used over the years. I shoot B&W Kodak T-MAX400 almost exclusively these days, although I do pop in a roll of T-MAX100 once in a while. As for color, I can’t remember the last time I used a color negative film slower than 400. I would probably recommend starting with TMX400 if you’re interested in B&W, I find it to be very versatile. Again, call up your local shop and make sure there will be no problems developing whatever film you decide to use.

Black & White

Slow: Ilford Pan F50
Mid/Fast: Plus-X, FP4,Tri-X, T-MAX400

Color

Slow: Kodak Gold 100, Fuji Super G 100
Mid/Fast: Kodak Professional Portra / Royal Gold 400, Fuji NPH

Important Note

When you buy your first used film camera, make sure to put a roll of cheap color film through it and have your photo lab develop straight to a CD so that you can check for possible issues with the camera. You’ll be able to see if there are light leaks, if the shutter is off or the aperture blades are malfunctioning.

I also recommend getting yourself a light meter or using your digital camera to meter (if you have one, of course). Write down the readings and compare them with the photos you get back to determine if your film camera has a metering problem.


Wrap Up

I know you’ll have many questions when you buy that first film camera and run that first roll through it, and a lot of it will be trial and error. But I hope this article will be enough to get you started and I encourage each of you to at least try shooting a couple rolls of film.

I’ve provided some options that cost next-to-nothing, so even if you don’t enjoy yourself, you’re not out that much cash. I’m betting you’ll have a blast!

Just be careful, it can become very addicting very quickly. Before you know it, you’ll be buying developer chemicals and trying to figure out which room in your house you can get away with turning into a darkroom!

All photos © Shane Parker Photography

Tags: Basix
  • http://facebook.com/xilantra Xilantra

    Awesome..this article makes me think to convert to slr.
    Now I know why there’s people still using slr.
    Thanks.

  • Connor Crosby

    Sorry, just got the Canon 60D. Nice article, though.

  • Peter

    Good article, but I think you missed two points where the film is yet to be beaten:
    1. Dynamic range – 8bpp is simply not enough for scenes with hight contrast.
    2. No noise during long exposure shots, the chemistry collects photons only.

    But for people with exploratory nature, like me, the digital is a lot better. I understood very little from the aperture, exposure and focus while shooting on the film. Now I am learning the (digital) photography anew. After a couple months with a compact, I know I need a DSLR. Now I am researching the options in this direction.

    • sofa0ne

      @Peter
      “2. No noise during long exposure shots, the chemistry collects photons only.”

      It should be noted that though you may not have noise, you do have grain, and then you also have Reciprocity Failure. Personally if shooting Color Digital is far easier to shoot long exposure shots, just my opinion though.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciprocity_%28photography%29

  • http://www.aprilblankenship.com April

    I have had the opposite experience of Peter. Film is where I learned to correctly judge aperture and shutter speed and that helps me with my DSLR. I would strongly recommend learning the basics on a good film camera before trying to master the DSLR. It’s like a shortcut to better photos.

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/f3lixlovesyou/sets/72157626077487256/ F3lixP (Félix Pagaimo)

    I’m looking forward to buy a Rolleiflex or Yashica TLR. The best would be an Hasselblad but the cost it too much for me right now!

    Great article.

  • http://planetcjd.co.uk/ Chris

    You’ve got me interested!

    Out of interest, of all the Canon cameras you mentioned, which one would you most recommend?

    • http://www.shaneparkerphoto.com Shane Parker
      Author

      Hi Chris,

      Out of the cameras I reviewed, I would recommend the Elan IIe. However, if you can find one for a decent price, I’d recommend the 1v or 7n; they’re still a little bit pricey. I probably should have mentioned that I posted these in order of personal preference.

  • me

    ive just recently gotten into photography and toataly agree with you that every newbie should at least pick up a film camera and use it once. i am mostly digital but also love the feeling of using film and somedays will just go out with my old minolta ,argus , or cannon and shoot some film.

    • Cheryl Hancock

      I am starting to do this and most of my pictures have been great, although I must confess that I am so very new to the photography world myself as far as learning the true techniques of getting everything right, and mostly do not know what I am doing so this is the reason I’m about to take a beginner’s class. I have taken many pictures in my life and mostly have had good pictures, by chance. The digital ones I have are great in that I just keep several memory cards and can take as many as I want without having to change out the film, so that is mostly what I use. I do look forward to the beginners class and I do want to take at least one class where I have to use my old camera and where I do have to think about what I am doing. My husband and I are about to start doing some traveling so I am going to take one of the digital ones and my old camera as well. I cannot wait to see how well I will do after taking the class. The problem that I am finding here in North Alabama though is finding a good local photography shop that can meet all of my needs as far as maintenance goes on the old cameras. Some shops have closed and so I’ve had to go as far as Birmingham to get them serviced. For me it is just easier to let a professional do it than mess it up myself. Anyway, this site has been so interesting and I wish to thank you guys for your good comments, they have been helpful to me so far. I’ve even taken notes some and it is great that everybody can get on here and help each other with issues.

  • http://sites.google.com/site/yorktonenvironmentdirectorate noelle

    Photography should never be expensive communication monopolies are great vexation. We all should be part of a media club network with home-tutorials. To a certain extent every person needs to be a journalist. Every person needs electro-magnetic security and archived homecare or service. Does everyone need a digital or electronica spa? We should never totally replace other forms of manual photography this is great a great love affair when we learn to use film Polaroid should have been alot more innovative than was allowed. I still think every Country at least should have it’s own brands of cameras. Every Province or State should have assembly factories for film and foto shop sales and custom electronics goods

  • http://sites.google.com/site/yorktonenvironmentdirectorate noelle

    cannon could make some of us feel really great if they would sell a camera really cheap that you can assemble yourself any photo you take can be mailed to a stockwarehouse for appraisal bid sale polaroid style home assembly kit cameras would be really fun collectivly

  • Jeremy

    Excellent piece. I started many years ago with film and have many old 35mm cameras lying around. I still use my old 120 Mamiya occasionaly as I have to take time when deciding on the shot and the images are supurb. With only 15 shots per roll you learn to take it carefully. Thanks.

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/sjgodfrey/ Stephen

    Nice short article Shane, I would have liked a bit more of a comparison between the two different capture devices. Both systems have there advantages in certain situations and quite often produce the same results.

    I don’t really agree with the argument that you should shoot film just to improve your technique. If you just shot your DSLR in manual you would improve quicker as you can see what happens quicker, you just need to think about what you are doing. Of course shooting film on an old camera forces you to do all the work so you have to think.

    Peter did mention the two main advantages of film, the other advantage is that if you are shooting medium format film (120) it can be scanned to a higher quality then a 40 megapixel camera can produce which cost $30,000 and up. A much cheaper way to produce a large print.

  • http://www.flickr.com/photos/draganche che

    Look, you got it all wrong i guess (DSLR wise)
    First you got autofocus SLRs with prosumer line wich is not good learning curve for anyone seriously interested in photography. Anyone would be better off with manual focus SLR from the pro lines of Canon (F1,A1 lines) Nikon (F1,F2,F3,FM,FM2) Olympus (OM1,2,3,4) or practicly any manufacturer form 50s to the end of 70s.
    They are cheap and have wide spectum of cheap lenses (and fast too)
    Rangefiner wise ure spot on with its range of compact rangefinders goes with fast lenses (1.7 1.8 2.0 2.8) like Canonette 17 QL, Olympus SP, RD, RC, Minolta Hi-Matic 7sII, 9, E, Yashica Electro 35 Professional, CC, and fastest compact to date Lynx 14E f1.4,Cosina 35 Compact E, Mamiya 135 EE, Ricoh GR1v, Konica Hexar 1993, Electron, Auto S2, Auto S, Auto S3, EE-Matic Deluxe F and the list just goes on. Remember good ones like this dont get that cheap couse rangefinders tend to be more expencive then their DSLR couterparts.
    Then come the interchangeble lens rangefinders that are mostly overpriced and the best option is to go with a russian made cameras like FED, KIEV, Leningrad, Zorki, and not forget the LOMO for playing around.
    Probably the best priced items on this list are Minolta CLE, Leitz Minolta CL (same camera and also the smallest pro rangfinder system to date).
    then there are Konica C35 AF, Hexar RF, Carl Zeiss Ikon, Zeiss Ikon ZI ZM FI 2005, Voigtlander Bessa, Contax G1 G2.
    I missing here one brand and you know the one that you’ll get if you are snob and got big pockets.
    120mm format is really good option and the best priced items on this list are Kiev 88 6x6cm and Arax version, Kiev 60 TTL, Mamiya SLR 645 series 6×4.5 (they can be mounted with digital backs)

    There you go…

    • http://www.shaneparkerphoto.com Shane Parker
      Author

      Thank you for your comment, I appreciate the large list of Rangefinders. I only have experience with a few Rangefinders, the QL-17 being the only affordable one, so I did not want to recommend all these others without having actual experience with them.

      My reasoning for suggesting more modern film SLRs is that it’s very hard to find old, manual, FD-mount cameras that aren’t in serious need of an overhaul unless you pay more for one that has been overhauled already (and then you have to trust that it was done properly). Those older cameras require more maintenance and care. Further, if a person chooses to start with film before moving to digital they would want to invest in lenses that would work on both systems; those older cameras don’t use the modern EF type mount.

      FYI, I’m not saying a beginner shouldn’t go pick up an FM*/AE* body, on the contrary, I love my old Canon cameras and they certainly teach you about exposure even more. However, for the purpose of this article, I still think the modern film bodies are less hassle, easier to find/purchase, and easier to get started with out of the gate without worrying too much about the condition of the camera.

      Anyway, those are my reasons for choosing what I did. I do appreciate your suggestions.

      • http://www.flickr.com/photos/draganche che

        Yeah, i agree One should be very carefull with buying used manual cameras and ofcourse checking it on site in vintage camera shops and specialized online camera shops and in my opinion AF camera can be much harder and pricey to repair than simpler manual. But i dont agree with a AF lenses having upper hand over manual lenses. They are better option nowdays, specialy for the people exploring and doing DSLR video work. their focus “ring tracking” is much shorter then their AF counterparts and mucho cheapoo (FD,OM). btw if you know any 17ql or III under 50 bucks with a option of shipping in europe and no paypal do let me know :)

        • http://www.shaneparkerphoto.com Shane Parker
          Author

          I think you may have misunderstood, I don’t think I recommended automatic focus lenses at all. I was referring to the type of lens mount, not whether the lens was manual or automatic focus (both FD and EF lenses have manual focus lenses). I’m a big fan of manual focus lenses myself!

  • http://lightcapturestudio.net patrick

    The ElaneIIE does have AE lock. Its the (*) button. all EOS cameras have AE lock. Also, its funny that you don’t mention eye control focus. that is this camera’s biggest selling point, ECF is still lacking in their digital bodies and im still totally puzzled as to why. with my 20D I have to focus in the center and recompose. auto point select is horrible and unusable compared with ECF. I dont know why canon abandoned technology.

  • http://www.shaneparkerphoto.com Shane Parker
    Author

    Hi Patrick,

    I goofed up on the AE lock, I left a note for myself regarding something about AE lock and never expanded on it, but somehow wrote that it had no AE lock (still scratching my head as to why I did that). Thanks for catching the error!

    As for eye control focus, I always thought it was more of a gimmick. I have always preferred manual point focus and even the auto-point selection, for me, has worked quite well. However, one very nice feature that I forgot to mention is the eye controlled DOF preview. I tend to assign AF start to my AE lock button and when you do that, you can’t use it for DOF preview, so the eye controlled DOF preview comes in very handy!

  • http://thephotophile.blogspot.com Lanthus

    Good article, reminds me to get my old cameras out of the drawer and use them again! I also agree that it is always a good thing for prospective photographers to get to grips with using film and that it will certainly enrich their skills.

  • http://twitter.com/juanhb Juan H Biscaia

    Actualy, i use my Zenit DF-300 to take some film photographies… But, i am very interest in buy one Pentax MZ-50 for te same purpose…

  • http://analognights.com Ludovic

    You should suggest some sovietic models as well. Most of them are replicas of famous brands, such as Leica. Besides that, they are built like tanks: my Zenith 122 fell from a moving car once and it still works perfectly.

    Compact toy cameras are good for learning as well. Take the Vivitar “Wide and Slim” for example… Perfect to learn composition in photography.

    Otherwise, great article (but i’ve ignored the comparison between film and digital hehe).

  • http://www.natalieavendano.com Natalie Avendano

    Hey guys! I bought the Canon Elan II but I am having trouble when developing the film. For some reason I am only getting 12 exposures out of a roll of film of 24 exposures. Is there a reason why this is happening? Is it common? Could it be the camera that is defective? Please help :) I am losing it! I appreciate it!!!

    • Shafie

      @natalie avendano

      imho,i think that maybe the film itself?what film u r using?
      erm,how about pm me at my email?ty :)

      im also use canon elan 2 :)

  • Dummer

    Shall I need a filter for the B/W film photography? Thanks for your reply.

  • http://www.hauntedcamera.tumblr.com Andy

    Great article. I actually did the reverse, though. I used digital to learn about exposure and then took that knowledge to film, which I think saved me a lot of money “finding out the hard way.”.

    Happy to say that I sold my last digital camera last month. The only digital camera I have now is on my phone.

    Long live film!

    Andy

  • Cheryl Hancock

    What type of camera is best for the first time beginner in the first photography class? I just bought a vintage Canon AE1 SLR Film camera because I’ve always loved collecting cameras and old vintage typewriters. I’m wondering if I should leave it shelved for my first class and use my digital film camera or go ahead and take it out. I really want to learn how to find the right light, etc. like the great photographers of my youth, like Ansel Adams and others like him, but I also want to make really great black and white pictures too….any advice for a true beginner?