Canon PowerShot GX1: Practical Review

Canon PowerShot GX1: Practical Review

Although not perfect, the new PowerShot Canon GX1 has a major asset: its new CMOS sensor, six times bigger than the G12 CCD sensor. While the technical aspects of this camera are impressive, we hope to get into more practical matters as well.


Canon PowerShot G1X: size matters

I’ve had a new Canon GX1 to play with for some days and I’ve decided not to read the manual and be mainly a snapshooter. Here are some results, and a few clues for pixel peepers.

I am a Canon user so I am mostly familiar with the controls and ways of functioning for Canon cameras. This said, I am a DSLR user, so I don’t especially like compact cameras. The results usually are below par when you mix a small sensor with the aim of getting bigger size images or working under difficult light conditions.

This is something that – almost – everybody knows, so I am not going to discuss it further here. But this Canon G1X, being a PowerShot, is something completely different from the rest of the Canon G-Series, which started in 2000.


The new PowerShot G1 X is not as compact as the traditional compact cameras.

The G series was always looked upon as Canon’s flagship in compact models, aimed at prosumer photography enthusiasts desiring more flexibility than a point-and-shoot, without the bulk of a digital single-lens reflex camera.

Previous G series cameras have had a small sensor, limiting their quality. Now, the flagship becomes a real stunner, because the PowerShot G1X sensor is, in fact, slightly bigger than a Micro/Four Thirds sensor. Canon refers to the G1X as their master compact, and that does say something.

Canon has not jumped on the “mirrorless” wagon and has not shown intention or any immediate plans to do so, but this camera is, somehow, an answer to all the mirrorless options from the other brands.

It’s true it does not have an interchangeable lens like the mirrorless systems, but it does sport a very usable 28-112mm f/2.8-5.8 equivalent zoom lens with a sensor made especially for it: a 18.7 x 14mm CMOS, a first in the G series. This sensor is only 20% smaller than the sensors Canon uses in its APS-C DSLRs. And Canon states that users can expect the same level of quality found in their entry level DSLRs, as the individual pixel size along with the pixel density of this new sensor matches that of the APS-C chip found inside the EOS 600D.


The quality of the lens and the low noise makes this a compact for real landscape work

A walk in the past

The previous and probably last PowerShot G camera with a smaller sensor, the G12, launched in September 2010, had the same amount of pixels as the G11, from 2009, some 10 MP on a 3648 × 2736 pixels CCD sensor. Canon had launched a 14,7 MP CCD with 1/1.7″ on the G10 (4416 × 3312 pixels and 7.6mm x 5.7mm in size), in October 2008, but returned to a more humble number of photo captors, due to problems with noise, even at lower ISO. The G11/G12 CCD sensor favored low light performance over resolution.

Meanwhile, many G users dreamed and talked about how the G series could be better if Canon used a bigger sensor, and the idea of such a PowerShot G camera ( the series has been used by many professionals as a support camera) has been kept alive for a long time.

Canon seems to have answered the call. So, the Canon Powershot G1X is an interesting camera, because it has a large 14.3 megapixel CMOS sensor that is capable of producing high quality images with lots of detail. And its ISO noise performance is impressive with low noise right up to high ISO settings, something that you are not able to do with “traditional” compact cameras.


The automatic HDR does a good job, although real fans of the technique will rather do it by hand.

Bigger than Micro Four Thirds

With 14.3MP, 4352x 3264 pixels (in 4:3 format, you can also choose 16:9, 3:2, 1:1 and 4:5) and 1.5″, this CMOS sensor is big. Bigger than the Micro Four Thirds and four times the size of the Fujifilm X10 sensor, so any comparison is not fair, I would think. Also, this camera is much bigger in size than the X10 and also bigger than any of the previous PowerShot G from Canon.

This is an X(L) size, if you want it that way, and it does give you, I would say, DSLR quality on a body that you can easily take with you anywhere. I say this because I can still carry it in a pocket of my photo vest or wind jacket.


An image for pixel peepers: it shows the whole frame as a thumbnail on top of a 600×400 that shows a full size portion of the original file.

I guess this was one of the reasons why I carried the Canon PowerShot G1X the last days and even for three days in a row, as my only camera, even if more than once I felt I should take my DSLR along.

There were only a few things that held me back from buying two of these cameras. I sometimes would be tired of my thumb inadvertently pressing the movie button on the back. It was difficult to properly see the images on the LCD under the light of day, and the viewfinder continues to be like an afterthought, a dark tunnel without any hint of what’s going on in terms of exposure.


The 28mm wide angle is enough to give you a sense of space and position elements within the frame.

Not a perfect camera

So, this is not perfect, and I wonder if we will ever have a perfect camera. I guess that would not be any fun. Although, I must admit that Canon did pull a nice rabbit out of their hat. This is a camera that most people looking for a serious compact will want to have close by. It looks and feels like a real camera. It gives you full manual control of exposure and has buttons and knobs for the most needed and logical functions.

It lets you define your preferences and access them (well, some of them) in the My Menu, as usual for Canon, and once you understand that the back dial is a tricky place to keep your thumb, as it can change parameters without you being aware of it (arghhhhh, I hate that!), you’ll be a very happy photographer. Even the zoom, although adjusted by rocking a slider, seem to be responsive enough for you not to lose your picture trying to get the precise framing you need.


Even when the light goes down, as in this late afternoon shot, the G1X offers you images that are free of noise.

When I use compacts I tend to lower my photography practice to a “compact level.” I know, it’s me, my fault, but that’s how my brain works. With this serious compact I felt like a new man, being able to work with it as if I was using a DSLR in LiveView all the time.

With the bonus that this does focus faster than DSLRs in LiveView, it somehow explains so many of the fantastic pictures I took on a photo tour I was leading recently. And I was able to use stuff like my Phottix Atlas radio triggers with and old Speedlite 430 EZ flash (in manual, you bet!).

I also discovered that this camera does HDR on its own and delivers images that look like good HDR examples and not the “art-garbage” some others are creating. I would like to be able to have more control on the HDR function, but those new to it will like the results.


Although the AF hunts when it gets dark, once it gets enough light to grab a reference point you’ll be able to get your shot, as this one, taken at 1/13 and f/5.0.

Snapshooting with quality

I was amazed and I’ve had a lot of fun. This article reflects that and also shows you some images that were mostly snapshots taken at aperture or speed priority and program, too. I just had the normal “adjustable things” to fix in Photoshop.

For pixel peepers’ sake, I placed an image here that shows the whole frame as a thumbnail on top of a 600×400 that shows a full size portion of the original file. I shot everything from 100 ISO, where I feel comfortable, up to 3200 ISO and the camera just gives you the goods without any problem. And I even shot at 12800 ISO for those that love to discuss grain. Look at the images!

But it was not and is not my aim to go that way. I just wanted to get some good images under different conditions and the published images just show I did. That’s all I ask a camera. The Canon G1X delivers.


Both images were shot at an aperture of f/5.6, with speeds of 1/1250 for the 12800 ISO and 1/13 for 100 ISO. The grain is present but, believe me, no compact can do this. Size matters!

Final thoughts

This is, no doubt, a take anywhere camera for serious shooters, but there are limitations. It’s not a fast shooter as some compacts are, only delivering 1.68 fps in “normal” mode (there are other options but they have limitations also), and it’s not a camera for macro enthusiasts used to going really close. Some go down to 1cm, the G12 included. The lens on the G1X struggles to reach the 20cm distance in Macro.

I would say this is a camera for good landscape work and for street photography, although the AF does have some trouble with low levels of light. Still, I got some great exposures at the end of day and I did not have issues I could not resolve using the PowerShot G1X. In fact, I would say that in real world situations the camera made me feel almost as comfortable as if I was using a DSLR. For me, that’s enough.

Although under the hood. you’ll find everything Canon knows in terms of programs and options, and even image stabilization, the above mentioned problems will be enough to keep some people away. And in the end, this camera has a price tag that puts it close to an entry level DSLR, so everybody will probably think twice before buying it. And even look closely at the options in “mirrorless” systems with interchangeable lenses, that might appeal more to some.

Still, this camera has no match for it. It’s so different from all the rest that it stands on a class of its own, as I guess Canon wanted. They took the popularity of the G series and used it to build a bigger body, with a big lens that makes the difference (even with its limitations) and with a sensor whose quality has no match. It’s the sensor, in fact, that is the true star of the G1X. And maybe it’s around that sensor that Canon will build their “mirrorless” option if they ever go that way.

  • MickM

    Thanks for this really good insight into this new model. I am a Powershot user and have been hoping for a Canon model with a near professional sensor size. This may fit the bill.
    Regards Mick

    • http://www.joseantunes.com Jose Antunes
      Author

      Thanks for your comment Mick. Although I’ve managed to write the name of the camera in different ways, my opinion is just one: this is fun to use. And this said from someone that prefers DSLRs and mostly thinks, when using a compact, “I should have brought my CAMERA” says it all. I am still having fun with this camera that is still here on my desk by now.

      Being the owner of a Panasonic G1 (the very first), and a Olympus PEN E-PL1 and being used to compacts – I’ve a Casio on the shelf behind me, besides my DSLRs, that I’ve been playing with for sometime now – this Canon just shows three things: a bigger sensor is better, a larger lens gives you better optics and… there’s nothing like being able to control a camera completely. The PowerShot G just found a new level. And this may be the start of a new trend.

  • http://www.funkyporcupine.com Funky Porcupine

    Was wondering how this new ‘big’ compact will perform, and your review is just perfect! Very interesting to read.

    • http://www.joseantunes.com Jose Antunes
      Author

      Thanks for comment Funky Porcupine. I enjoyed and still enjoy playing with this big compact. it’s big, but as I say, sometimes size really matters. The images I’ve here do show that.

  • http://www.toolsies.com Shay

    Would you buy an s100 or gx1?

    • http://www.joseantunes.com Jose Antunes
      Author

      It depends on the size of your pocket… :-)

      I don’t have an answer for you, really. I would always go for the G1X because I like what the sensor gives me. But some people will prefer a S100 for the size… I’ve a friend that is an airline pilot and he uses a S100 on cockpit to do some great stuff in terms of video, and snaps while at work, but uses a EOS 50D when he is out and about. I guess the G1X would be a bit too big for that… for the cockpit I mean.

      I always think that the answer might be different for each of us. I am more comfortable with a bigger sensor, but I am also more comfortable with a long lens around… but I also like the challenge of using just one lens and also compact cameras. I’ve written here at PT an article about the use of compacts and I love the challenge. I am lucky because I do have different models being sent for me to try, and that helps me to better understand the importance of choices. But my choices might not be the best for other people. I would go for an DSLR all the time – even with a single lens – but this said there are times when I am sure I would regret it. A compact with a zoom lens would do a better job. So, there’s always a compromise.

      S100 or G1X? The G1X for me, sure. But some days the S100 would be better. I think it’s the same with other stuff. You have to choose and accept the good and bad things that come with that… I hope this answers your question.

  • Robbo Mann

    A very informative straight-to-the-point article. Thank you.
    Still wondering though: I like both the ISO dial and the exposure +/- dial being so available on the G12 but noticed the ISO dial seems to be missing on the G1X. Is the ISO setting on the G1X a multi button-pushing task ? I shoot lots of photos while in motion going from bright sunlight to dark forested canopy and back so need quick ISO changes as I go.

    -Rob

    • http://www.joseantunes.com Jose Antunes
      Author

      The ISO setting is changed via a button on the back and then the dial on the back to set the speed. If you’re changing locations and need to change ISO I would let the camera in Auto. It will change up until 1600 ISO what might be enough for your needs. Anyway, it’s easy to set ISO via the button and dial.

      JA

  • http://www.iphotocourse.com David Tong

    Wonderful and insightful review, the photos are stunning as well so kudos to that too.
    How’s the different and bokeh of the relatively slow lens at normal portrait focal lengths and distances? The size kinda threw me off when I was compare it with the Olympus O-MD, for example and the back buttons were still as annoying as the G12 I recently sold.

    Thanks,
    DAVE from iPhotoCourse.com

    • http://www.joseantunes.com Jose Antunes
      Author

      Hi David, thanks for your comment

      concerning bokeh, the G1X does give you a nice enough bokeh, although it will not be up to what you can get on a DSLR with a more luminous lens.

      Besides that the camera has problems with the distances it can focus. 20cm on macro at wideangle and f/2.8 and then 85cm and f/5.8 at the longer focal still in macro, are not good options to get areas in focus and out of focus. When you change to normal focusing you’ve 40cm at wideangle and 1.3 meters at the longer focal, so it’s hard to get those nice out of focus backgrounds.

      This said, it all depends on the distance between the main subjects and whatever is behind, the kind of light and some other things. You do get some bokeh, but it’s not as easy as one can get with, for example, a 50mm f/1.8or f/1.4 even on an APS-C camera. If the G1X would focus closer in macro, it would probably do a better job. I would be able to use it for my flowers, for example… As it is, and I still believe it’s an interesting camera (Canon is picking it up tomorrow…), it has some limitations for certain types of work. But as I wrote, the sensor and the quality of the lens do make you forget some of the shortcomings. And I do like the challenge it represents to try to do the best one can with it…

  • random

    You called it the gx1 in the title. Just sayin’.

    • http://www.joseantunes.com Jose Antunes
      Author

      and if you read further down you find I called it also Canon PowerShot G1X: size matters… and G1X further down the text. And if you read the comments you’d fiind I wrote…”Although I’ve managed to write the name of the camera in different ways, my opinion is just one”.

      My title was in fact “Canon PowerShot G1X: size matters” but my editor wrote another title and because I had written GX1 he picked it from there. Still, if all you can comment about is that the title is wrong… well it’s said.

      Thank you, we know.

      :-)

      JA

  • Stu

    I bought one in Hong Kong recently (quite a bit cheaper than the rest of the World) I find the images are a little over exposed & there doesn’t seem to be too much punch in the colour department – but that has always been the case with whatever Canon I have owned in the Past; but that being said this a beast of a compact.

    Here’s a quick snap I took this morning http://imgur.com/r56vy

  • Dee

    Is this camera good for action shots like cheerleading or basketball?

    • http://www.joseantunes.com Jose Antunes
      Author

      Hi Dee

      No, I don’t think I would use it for that. It’s good for landscape, general photography but not for things with lots of movement. Look elsewhere.

  • Jerome

    Jose,

    First thank you for your great review.

    I have been owner of the G12 stole not long ago in Paris. I am now thinking to buy canon G1X to replace it.
    I consider myself as a passionate. I am not a professional photographer. However, I love everthing about photos and in the mid terms I would like to buy a professional camera.
    The main use of my camera is when I travel thats why I always carried small one like previously G12. Do you think G1X is good camera enought or would you advice me another one around 700 euros ?

    I was thinking to buy G1x, waiting that I will have enought money to buy one like 7D as I consider that I should be a good camera with lens and not the first price like 600D.

    thank a lot for your advices.

    • http://www.joseantunes.com Jose Antunes
      Author

      Hi Jerome

      thanks for your comment.

      Sorry to hear your cam was stolen.

      The G1X can be your camera to replace the G12, and it will do a MUCH BETTER job, really. In fact it’s very much like a 7D or a 600D (they, both DSLR, share the same base specs) in terms of general results, thanks to the CMOS sensor and the Digic5 processor (remember 7D and 600D have Digic4).

      If you want something small and are aware of the limitations of the G1X, go for it. If you’re like me and can not live without a DSLR, then look elsewhere. And don’t put th 600D aside. I had one for testing and I enjoyed it a lot (I also tried the 7D).

      I ‘ve written before that I would not buy a 600D because it used different battery and card and also because I am used to the layout of controls from the EOS 7D/50D, – the 60D is completely different, Canon as messed up the line, really, maybe it will be right with the 70D, but I’ve to say I’ve changed opinion.

      I recently won a Nikon DSLR D3100 but as I had no use for it – I’ve some old Nikon lenses from my film F90 that would not work on it – I traded it for a Canon DSLR. I do not like the 60D, and don’t want to spend money on a 7D, which is “old” as it came out in 2009, so I decided to get the 600D, from 2011, that will do the trick until the new 70D or somet Digic 5 DSLR camera comes out. And the 600D will last for quite a while and it’s cheaper. So, I’ll go for the 600D as an option.And you can bet it works fine.

      Remember, though, that you have to carry more stuff around. But then you have faster AF and some other nice things to… It’s always a trade off…

      Hope this helps

      JA

  • http://www.thestylegap.blogspot.com Gabi

    Hey, I’m thinking about Canon G1X and, for example, Canon 600D? Which one is, in general, a better camera?
    My Sony DSC HX1 was stolen not so long ago, but in fact i was very disapponted with it – I don’t know, there was something wrong with this camera and I wasn’t able to use it properly.

    I would like to buy something which is good, not so expensive and will be easy to use.
    Could you recommend one of those? I heard that Canon G1X is quite big (is it bigger than the Sony one)?

    Thanks for your time.

    • http://www.joseantunes.com Jose Antunes
      Author

      Hi Gabi

      They’re different. If you want a smaller camera (well, not much smaller, really) the G1X is the right choice. If you want the versatility of a DSLR, the EOS 600D is the answer. It’s not easy tho choose unless you know what type of photography you want to do. I would go for the EOS 600D, because I prefer (D)SLRs, but that is my choice. Anyway, sometimes I would not mind having a G1X around.

      The G1X is great, and it is big because the sensor is bigger than compacts, and so is the lens. That helps to get results that are much like those you get from the EOS 600D.

      I can not give you a final advice. You’ll have to choose based on a simple question you have to ask yourself: what type of photography do I like to do? That will give you the answer to which is the best choice.

  • http://www.mobilepriceupdate.com mazhar

    i wanted to buy, this GX1. i will wait for other perfect camera. thanks for this review

  • Henry

    I cant get my new GX1 to automatically macro focus like my last 3 canon G cameras.

    Even when I set it to the macro flower setting it is blurred.

    I haven’t yet tried the manual focus for macro but feel as if I shouldn’t have to.

    Any answers?

  • http://caiobraga.com.br Caio Braga

    Eu tenho uma G1X e adoro. Baixísismo ruído em ISOs altos, tem um peso “agradável” (nem muito leve que parece que está “voando na sua mão” e nem tão pesada a ponto de incomodar) ou seja, o fato dela ter um certo peso ajuda a segurá-la melhor. A qualidade da filmagem em FullHD 1080p (embora não me utilize muito desse recurso) é muito bacana.

    O sensor grande e as aberturas relativamente altas, permitem brincar um pouco com profundidade de campo e criar desfoques agradáveis separando planos. Não chega a fazer aquele “bokeh responsa”, mas já é muito melhor do que qualquer compacta que eu tenha brincado.

    Minha única crítica ainda fica na esfera do design/ergonomia/estilo. Fiquei muito indeciso entre ela e a Fuijfilm X100 e hoje confesso que preferia ter comprado a X100 mesmo estando limitado a uma lente fixa (que aliás eu adoro), mesmo só tendo a opção de filmar em 720p e mesmo com todas críticas ferrenhas com relação ao AF (mesmo depois de tantas atualizações de Firmware).

    Confesso que ainda não encontrei uma câmera compacta que substitua a minha DSLR com a “competência” que eu gostaria. Acho que a G1X quase “chegou lá”. Ainda estou sonhando com uma câmera como a X-Pro1 da Fuji, mas com qualidade Canon e com preço justo.

    PS: Fiquei torcendo para a Canon criar a sua mirrorless nos moldes das antigas Canonet QL, com rangefinder confiável e cristalino a’la LEICA, sensor APS-C (ou até fullframe, porque não), com aquele disparador levíssimo como o das Olympus OM, com comandos mecânicos…mas não: eles fizeram a EOS M (http://www.gizmodo.com.br/canon-eos-m-finalmente-primeira-camera-mirrorless-da-canon/), o que na minha modesta opinião, é decepcionante, principalmente em termos de design. Bacana ela ter lentes intercambiáveis, e Incontestável a qualidade das imagens que ela produz, mas nota ZERO em estilo e design. E telinha touchscreen…putz…é mais um “gadget bacaninha” do que uma câmera compacta séria voltada para profissionais.

  • penandthink

    Thanks for the review and the photographs! Have you tried to take any macros?