Can Photographers Replace their Laptops with Tablets?

Can Photographers Replace their Laptops with Tablets?

Over the last two weeks, I have completed a social experiment to see if a tablet computer, in my case the iPad 2, could replace the humble laptop for my everyday photography chores. Read along and find out if it’s an viable option for your needs.

Introduction

About a month ago, I purchased an iPad 2 mainly for internet use, music and glorified solitaire. However, as I was lugging my Macbook around I suddenly thought to myself, “why do I need this?” It’s heavy and when out on a shoot I only need to dump files, surely my iPad should be a perfect replacement.

I had a two-week trip to Italy booked and therefore decided to leave the laptop at home and only take the iPad, effectively helping saving weight and therefore not having to pay fees for a heavier bag. My camera gear takes almost all the allowed weight.

However, before I left their were a couple of problems I had to overcome.

The First Problem: Data Transfer

Apple has not included anyway of inserting a USB device or SD card on the actual device. So in order to upload any pictures you have  to purchase the camera connection kit at the price of £25, which I felt was slightly steep for an adaptor.

If like myself your camera uses a compact flash card then you will need to use the USB to iPad connection. This also means you have to carry around the AV output to USB cable, which is slightly annoying when you are forced to purchase the SD reader in the same pack. I don’t understand why they cannot sell them separately.

Other tablets such as the Samsung Galaxy or Asus Eee Slate don’t have this problem as they include a USB slot or micro SD card reader. However compact flash users are still going to have to carry around that annoying cable.

The Second Problem: Storage

My canon 7D loves eating hard drive space, using around 6MB per jpeg and 50MB per RAW file. Video files are even worst using around 1GB for 3 minutes worth of footage. The top range iPad only goes up to 64Gb, this is only 59.1GB once you include the default operating system and realistically half of that space is going to be used up with applications, music and videos, so it effectively left me with just 26.0GB of space.

I didn’t think this would last me, so I decided to try and plug in my external hard drive. However the iPad refused to read it. After a Google search I found that only a jailbroken iPad is able to accept hard drives and even this requires a small hack.

The last option is that you can use cloud storage that companies such as Dropbox and Amazon. However, sending a large amount of data to the cloud is going to require a good internet connection and a fair amount of bandwidth. If traveling abroad like myself wireless connections are difficult to get hold of and the 3G prices are not even worth thinking about.

My only solution for my trip was to shoot JPEG only and then RAW on the last couple of days. It was slighting annoying and I did use all 20GB of storage.

The iPad Camera

The iPad 2 has a 1MB camera (yes, you read that correct) and it is very poor and almost useless other than for applications such as skype or facetime. The quality when shooting outside was a lot better than inside, but any cheap compact or mobile phone is going to be better.

And who really wants to carry around a tablet in order to take pictures? It looks very weird in public and is not as simple as just grabbing your mobile out of your pocket.

Below is a picture shot on the iPad. Note the high amount of noise.

Importing your Photos

When you connect your camera up to the iPad, it allows you to pick the images you wish to import. The touch interface makes this selection easy and more enjoyable than on a computer. I personally found it to be much be a lot more minimal and tidy that than Canon’s own import software. Naturally the iPad also includes the option to import all the photos in one go, which is the setting I most commonly used.

When finished importing, the iPad automatically asks if you wish to delete the photos off the card. A handy feature however I personally prefer to format my memory card on the actual camera. Also sometimes you only want to import a single photo and don’t wish to wipe the memory card.

Much like on your computer the iPad stores the photos in folders named after the date the images were shot. These can be found in the standard photos application.

Speed

The speed of transfer between the iPad and my camera was surprisingly very quick. It didn’t appear to be any slower than upload to my laptop or desktop. Overall I was very impressed with it and had no complaints.

However getting approximately 5000 photos (20Gb) from my iPad to my computer took a little over 4 hours using iPhoto. I felt this was very poor and I am going to attempt to search for a better alternative in the weeks ahead.

Editing with PS Express

When away I always like to look over my pictures and edit a few before I come back. My personal choice on a laptop is Adobe Photoshop. Adobe have been keen to join in on the tablet craze and have made an iPhone/iPad application named PS express.The software is free to download (which is unusual for Adobe) however does have extra add-ons with more advanced features for a small fee.

Adobe Photoshop for iPad allows you to crop, straighten, rotate and flip your photos. In terms of adjustment, you can change the exposure, contrast, saturation, tint, and convert to B&W.

There are a couple of fancy filters effects, which effectively stick horrid looking filters on top and try to pretend they are a masterpiece. Adobe appears to have added them to give non-photographers the chance to feel they are more creative. Professionally you probably wouldn’t go near them.

One feature I personally liked that the desktop version doesn’t include at the current time was the ability to share straight away on social media sites such as Facebook. It’s a great feature for sharing photos quickly without having to go through Facebook’s, quite frankly, awful image uploader.

The only real weakness of the application was the time it took to save a photo after you finished editing. I just did some basic edits and although the effects were real time, the save time was over a minute. However lower resolution images were considerable faster. With the iPad’s camera, photos saving in around 2-3 seconds.

Overall PS express is a decent photography application, but compared to the desktop application, you simply miss huge number amount of tools. I personally miss not being able to use masks to control the effects over set objects.

Other Applications

Flickr - Entered the app store very recently. Share your photos. Watch the world. However, reviews suggest Flickrstack is actually a better application.

Camera Bag – Allows you to add filters on top of your photos. Again, it’s very limiting when actually editing.

Tilt Shift Generator for iPad – Create a fake looking tilt shift photo in minutes. Handy but very specific.

Keynote – Create slide show style presentations. It’s great for presenting photos, but has no editing features.

Other Features

The iPad can connect to WiFi printers in order to print off your photos without having to transfer them to your computer. Unfortunately at the current time, I don’t own a WiFi printer so was unable to test this feature.

Another feature I liked was being able to email photos. I used it a couple of times to show people where I was in Italy and I found it to be straight forward and easy to use.

Overall thoughts

Positives:

  • Saves lugging a heavy laptop around
  • Easy to use interface for viewing photos
  • Importing photos is relatively fast and easy once you have the equipment
  • Stores both JPEG and RAW files

Negatives:

  • Lack of storage on longer trips
  • Currently has no serious editing application
  • No support for editing RAW files

Conclusion

My overall conclusion is that the iPad at the current time is not quite ready to be a replacement for a laptop, however I can appreciate it is a great tool when out and about. It kept me entertained on train journeys, flights and in hotel rooms while being much lighter than my laptop.

At the current time, it is obviously not the perfect tool for photography due to the lack of storage and RAW support, but I can see things in the future changing when hard drives get cheaper and some clever spark develops an application to edit RAW files. Maybe one day, we will also be able to sync the camera and tablet wirelessly.

Overall, I was impressed and will not bother taking my laptop in the future when on shorter weekend trips away or when out visiting a client.

  • KamuiVII

    I find this article interesting, but lacking in thoroughness. First you didn’t compare other tablets, as your article is labeled TABLETS, but you only compared the iPad. With only a slight reference to the Galaxy and Asus.

    Here are a few of my thoughts:

    1. Don’t use iPhoto to import; Drag and drop your photos into a folder, it will take less time. Then you can import them into iPhoto, Aperture, or LightRoom. The reason why it takes so long is because you have iPhoto copy them into its library.

    2. You didn’t compare other good photo editing apps for the iPad; like PhotoPad, FilterStorm, ArtStudio to name a few. Now these are paid apps .99 – $5 but do a better job than PSex. But the downfall to any iOS app is that they scale down your images to like 3000×3000 and convert them to 72dpi and JPG. But like you said not a viable editing solution.

    3. If you have a printer connected to your computer and there both on. You can buy an extension called PRINTOPIA for the MAC. And print off of any printer connected to your computer, if your within your home network.

    4. The iPad is a good photographers tool. Not THE best or viable to all photographers. I use my iPad1 as an external monitor. I use 2 (4gb and 8gb)EYE-FI cards, have my camera settings at RAW+JPG(Basic). The 4GB card is for use when I have my iPad, and the 8GB is when I have my laptop. and with my laptop I can shoot nearly endlessly (battery life becomes an issue). And with my MBP it transfers both Raw and Jpg, where on the iPad it only transfer the JPG for review.

    So for me, my iPad has become a valuable tool in taking snaps and making them as perfect as possible. Its all how you use it after looking at ALL the options.

    • http://PSDtutorials.co.uk Peter Sawyer
      Author

      Good evening, I wrote this article without internet connection (on my iPad actually), so I tried my best to research everything I could,

      Also I labeled the article “Can you replace your laptop for an iPad?” however this was changed after submission.

      1. For some reason when I upgraded to lion my iPad wouldn’t read. Fixed it now though and I agree the method you mention is a lot better.

      2. Agreed, But I didn’t want this article to go to much further over the 2000 word limit….. and I though I would leave the reviews to iPad Appstorm.

      3. Thanks for the advice – Didn’t actually know that.

      Agreed I love using the iPad but like I concluded its not quite ready for serious photography use.

  • http://www.rocketstudio.com Madara

    The Asus Transformer is interesting because when docked to the keyboard you can access an SD card slot and a USB port. Has anyone had experience using the Transformer for photographers? I like the idea of inserting my SD card and backing up to an external HDD. I think a tablet is the best way to show/review your photos.

    Also are they good photo editing apps for Android?

  • mac

    the article is very intresting and what i understood is tablets other than ipad,say galaxy, is two time better than apple’s one. although apple has introduced a powerful n stylish tablet, it has more to go…

  • Diane Fields

    I agree with the above poster. To add one more app for processing, Snapseed. I don’t carry my laptop any longer either but shoot in RAW + jpeg and carry quite a few cards, memory is cheap. I upload most all, review them, but if I need more storage (I still have 64GB 1st gen) I simply delete some. Unfortunately this doesn’t give me backup but I do carry all my cards home and upload to Lightroom. If I have room I’ll do as above. Its not as good as my laptop because of storage primarily but the difference in weight–and more–is worth the compromise,

    Diane

  • steve

    Take a look at adoramatv.com for the i-pad app video reviews. Great!

  • Eric

    Addressing each of your cons…

    1) HyperMac makes external drives that include card readers and can be viewed on the iPad. Essentially a photo dump device that supports using your iPad screen to view and of course, import for editing. Capacity goes as big as 2.5″ HDDs get, and is user replaceable,

    2) You only reviewed PS Express, which compared to apps like Filterstorm is a bad choice. Filterstorm supports editing up to and beyond the 18MP pictures of the 7D on the iPad 2. It has the curves and histograms expected in a serious editing program, as well as local adjustment with brushes, graduated adjustments, etc..

    3) Raw files can be edited, but not directly. What’s seen is the JPEG conversion of the raw image. As far as I know, this has yet to be made possible by Apple.

  • Frank

    Hi Peter,
    thanks for the article. But had you done a few things differently you might have had a better experience.

    First, Photoshop Express is probably one of the weakest photo editing apps for the ipad / iphone. Take a look at Filterstorm Pro or – my favorite – Snapseed from Nik Software. Both are incredible useful apps. The only drawback is that Snapseed at least doesnt have full resolution output – yet – but for the web it’s good enough.

    And both apps have no problem handling and editing raw files quickly!

    There are tons of apps out there that make the ipad a very useful tool for photographers and one of them is definately Photoysnc wth which you can wirelessly sync images to and from your ipad / computer / other ios devices. It’s highly recommend all over the web.

  • http://www.shaneparkerphoto.com Shane Parker

    I use an iPad to show clients photos during a shoot, sometimes. But I still prefer (by a large margin) using my 17″ MBPro. The iPad is WAY too slow to get any real work done, the resolution is too low, and it can’t grab all my raw files, on the fly, dump them into Aperture, run a couple actions and present the photos for review… it’s simply not even in the same league as a laptop (and certainly not a desktop). It’s also nearly useless for those of us shooting RAW and using CF cards. I’ve been really disappointed in the iPad for professional-level use. The limitations I listed above were imposed by Apple, not by what the device could actually do if they hadn’t closed it off so much.

    On the flip-side, I could see a tablet like the Galaxy tab doing wonders for photography because it’s nowhere near as limited as the iPad. And yes, if you’re going to title your article; “…replace their laptops with tablets”, you really should have included other tablets for review. This article should have been titled; “…replace their laptops with an iPad.”

    An iPad for a point-n-shoot on vacation? Sure. iPad for pro’s? No way. You WILL need a computer at some point on any professional shoot.

    • http://psdtutorials.co.uk Peter Sawyer
      Author

      Cheers Shane for your input.

      To be completely fair I labeled the article “Can you replace your laptop for an iPad?” however this was changed after submission.

      I love the iPad but I have to agree you cannot really work on it as a serious photography device at the moment. You mentioned being slow however apart from the saving of files I never really could complain.

  • http://www.fotomedic.net Christopher Matthews

    Thanks for the info on the iPad. I think you are omitting a fair comparison. The iPad is akin to buying and installing a new refrigerator. After you finish loading it up with your wares, the company calls you and tells you they’re voiding your warranty for not buying groceries through them.

    With an Android tablet, the problems will lessen, since your device isn’t as locked down, but I concede it isn’t presently going to be much better than the iPad. Take heart, NVIDIA Tegra quad-core processors may hit the market in only a few more months, making a tablet nearly as full-featured as tablet PC by the new year. In the mean time, consider that the ASUS EP121 (with Wacom Pen) and HP 500 Slate are full Win 7 tablets about the same size as a Galaxy 10.1, and IBM/Lenovo is coming out with a new IdeaPad soon, and there are Android equivalents available too. I suffer from the same complaints you encountered even on an Android, to the point I gave it up altogether. I wanted an HP TouchSmart TM2T, but they discontinued it when I finally saved enough money, so I now run a Lenovo X201 Tablet with Win 7. I get access to CS5 Design Premium, 3DS Max, Maya, SketchBook Pro, Office, Firefox, RockMelt, Audacity, and more. I get 2-point multitouch, an i7 processor, up to 8GB DDR3RAM, Intel HD 3000 graphics with 1280×800 resolution on a 12″ widescreen (it’s about the size of a 3-ring binder), Wacom Pen-enabled screen, BT, WiFi, GSM/GPRS/or CDMA card, SDHC, Express 34 card slot, USB2, gyro, docking station with DisplayPort and DVD drive, a ruggedized magnesium case (doesn’t need an otterbox and is far less temperature sensitive), BT connected GPS unit, can tether to my Android phone or an iPhone, etc. Put any size SDHC card in, drop in any size laptop SATA drive, sync with any external HDD in less than 5 minutes for the first time, and 10 seconds after that. What do you get with an iPad??? Whatever Apple lets you have. Now if they’d only release a MacPad Pro edition, I’d probably be first in line.

    Android offers the most non-PC promise out there since it is basically a mobile OS shell over a Linux core. This means nearly complete freedom to develop and expand into a full-fledged, full-featured operating system in the next year+, and the hardware keeps getting better to the point the next gen quad-cores will be as fast as a dual-core desktop (even a Mac) with 3D graphics available.

    As for the camera, well, your 7D is a camera first, then it’s a camera. The iPad, and any tablet or PC for that matter is a computer first, that has a camera on it. Unless Canon starts dropping Digic processors into webcams, the result will NEVER be acceptable, even compared to a cheap point-&-shoot, but hey, the viewfinder on the 7″+ tablet LCD is AWESOME compared to a regular 2-3″ camera LCD – LOL!!!

    Photoshop Express is neat for a phone, but when you can run the real deal on a real tablet with a multi-core processor at the expense of only a pound or three more, you have to look at an “app” as just an “app”, which is always going to be less than a full “program”. Does it do just enough? Is the sacrifice of less than 3 pounds to gain of about 2-3″ of overall surface area and all the full computer features worth it? Can photographers REPLACE their laptops with tablets (or slates)? My personal answer is no, not presently, but the answer for anyone else is going to be case by case preference. I definitely think you should revisit this article in a year and bring the new iPad 3 and a Xoom or Galaxy tablet with you to compare. By then, the playing field should be way more leveled, and maybe some app development advances will help.

    • http://PSDtutorials.co.uk Peter Sawyer
      Author

      Love the part about the camera on the tablet.

      Agree with you in a way, but some mobile phones have such good cameras for such a small sensor. I don’t really understand why they couldn’t have done a little better.

      I am looking forward to the future as I do really believe that tablets in 2 years time will be just as good….

      Will be interesting to see how windows 8 stirs things up as well. An OS designed for desktops and tablets…… may go really well, may be a flop. Not sure yet.

  • Alan

    If you are talking about someone who would actually consider shooting photos with a computer/laptop/pad then I’m sure it would be good enough, but if you are talking about professional or serious amateurs, the idea is comical.

  • TomasF

    Thanks for an interesting article.

    I’ve got an Asus Transformer and it’s actually pretty decent for handling the files. With the optional keyboard/dock, you get 2 standard USB ports, and it accesses standard external USB drives just fine, as well as connecting the camera directly for transfer from the CF in my D300s. Also, with an even larger battery in the keyboard module, battery life is fantastic and your productivity skyrockets with a proper keyboard :) It brings the weight up slightly, but removes the need for a screen protector, and quite frankly, with nothing being quite as heavy as a MPB, this is still a feather by comparison.

    As for editing on the go, the options seem a little more limited. I haven’t had any real need for this so far so I can’t say I’ve dug deep for good apps, though. On the positive side, Adobe is aware of Androids potential to eclipse the tablet market like it did the smartphone market, and is working on something for us android users as well :)

    In terms of options and flexibility I really love this platform, and while I’m of the type that wouldn’t buy an Apple product if at all possible, I’m a little surprised that someone who does seems disappointed that a small addon kit costs £25…

    • http://www.photosbymotti.com/blog motti

      Tomas, I agree, people who buy Apple products should not be surprised by heft cost for little Chinese made plastics!

      I am very interested what Android has in terms of editing AND showing images. I am about to purchase the Asus Transformer.

      Cheers,
      Motti

    • http://PSDtutorials.co.uk Peter Sawyer
      Author

      I confess I am a little bit of an apple fanboy. I do buy lots of apple products and understand their add ons come with a premium price….what I found annoying was that you had to buy two adapters when you really only need one.

      I don’t like spending £12.50 on an adapter that will actually never be used…. but perhaps I didn’t put this across as clearly as I hoped.

      I would be interested to hear more about how the android tablets are to use when dealing with photos….I have used an android phone for a short period but never a tablet.

  • Steve Carlton

    I am excited about iOS 5, I am hoping a lot of the workflow issues I experience with my iPad will be resolved.

    I think my biggest complaint is the fact that I cannot group pictures into albums on the iPad itself.

    Recently I have started using Flickr Studio to upload all pictures to Flickr as private, I can group the photos in the app as I upload them so it works great.

    If I want to share (unedited), then I just make the image public. If I want to edit I can download the image on to my PC for editing.

    Thanks for the article, I enjoyed it!

    Steve

  • http://www.liveeyephoto.com Eric Borkowski

    I have an iPad and and iPad 2 and I never use a laptop or pc that much anymore to do minor edits. Ey do sell hard drives for the iPad you just have to know where to look. Also compact flash cards are cheap, stock up on a few cards and your set. If you know how to bend the rules of the iPad 2 it works great in the field for you. There are also huge apps that will do great photo editing. You just have to know what it can and can’t do.

  • http://newtripod.com/ New Tripod

    I can never use iPad for post processing. iPad is good for browsing through images and for small editing in Photoshop Express or other applications. But I think in near future we can do all these with a tablet (Not Only iPad).

    I have to check all other applications mentioned by KamuiVII. Hope those are better then PSEx.

  • Joe Bodego

    Didn’t learn much here and I am not surprise that apple products forces you to see the world through a very narrow whole. This guy could have had a better experience with just about any other tablet but he made a choice to stick with the foolish Ipad. He can’t see pass the Ipad even though it costs him money for a plastic adapter. I have an Ipad 2 and never uses it, thank heavens it was free. When I do decide to buy a tablet it would be one with that’s made with common sense in mind. Imagine a tablet without USB and an SD card slot? this is a perfect mix of marketing,propaganda and stupidity.

  • Reservoir_Dan

    This article is woefully misinformed about the capabilities of the ipad for location photography storage and editing.

    There are multiple options to add external, wireless storage for an iPad. Try Google.

    There are multiple, powerful photo editing apps like Filterstorm, Snapseed, Iris, Tiffen Photo FX Ultra etc…everything you want from masks, levels, curves, blending, grad filters, soft effects, local adjustments, etc…can be done with these and other apps. With Tiffen Photo FX, for instance, you can even email yourself an adjustment code after editing an image then import that to Aperture or PS on your desktop and instantly apply the identical adjustments to the RAW file with Tiffen DFX software. I could go on.

    I applaud your effort but your research and knowledge of the subject at hand is weak, and frankly, wrong.

  • Alex

    Hi Peter,

    Have you checked out Photosmith? It’s a third-party companion app for Lightroom. While your points about the storage space and transfer speeds are as true for me as they are for you, I love that Photosmith lets me reject, rate, label and organize photos into collections, all of which I can then sync wirelessly while on the road.

    It doesn’t have any editing functions currently, but it does have the ability to share selected photos with Flickr or Facebook.

  • Reece

    Nice review. I’ve been trying to compare tablets that I could considere buying to replace my laptop when I’m shooting and it hasn’t been easy. The only reason I was considering the IPAD was because of Sketchbook Pro but when they made the app available for Android Tablets I then changed my mind. The other advantage the IPAD seems to have is the display which seems to be somewhat more vibrant than some other Android based tabs, excluding the Galaxy tabs. I see everybody hates the limitations of the IPAD made by Apple and so do I such as the missing usb port and SD card slot. I totally agree with @ChristopherMatthews though and I was leaning towards a Windows based tablet also, especially one with a display compatible with a Wacom pen as I plan on becoming an Industrial Designer.