A Neutral Density Filter Primer

A Neutral Density Filter Primer

Neutral Density (ND) filters are a bit like sunglasses for your lens. Except that sunglasses typically tint the light coming through in one form or another. As true color rendition is often important to photographers, neutral density filters strive to lessen the amount of light passing through them without coloring or changing the nature of the light.

The effects of using these filters can be drastic. Some block out almost all light and thus allow for results that weren’t previously possible. Others only block a portion of the light, allowing individual expression of what is found in front of the camera. All filters help in a way that is currently superior to standard computer manipulation techniques as they help preserve the data being recording in the camera, as compared to post-production which is often attempting to recover data that may not exist when a filter is not used.

There are four basic types of neutral density filters we will go over in this article: standard, variable, graduated and reverse graduated. All have a preferable time and use, resulting in different effects on the end product.

Standard Neutral Density

A standard neutral density filter is just that, standard. They come in either round versions that screw right onto a lens’ threads or in a square/rectangular version to work with filter holders. As neutral density filters are the same darkness across their surface, screw-in versions are often popular for their simplicity of use.


Copyright Peter West Carey

Neutral density filters come in a variety of darknesses as measured by standard stops. A stop is the halving or doubling of the amount of light available and these filters list their potency to block light in either the fashion “1 stop” or 0.3 EV” or “”x2″. As the filter numbers increase, the filter becomes darker and darker by a predictable amount, resulting in the need to adjust either shutter speed, ISO or aperture to compensate for a properly exposed image. Most often shutter speed is adjusted to help increase motion blur in an image.

While these three means of listing filters look different, they are all conveying the same thing. The “x2″ or sometimes “2x” filter is halving the shutter speed. (e.g. 1/60 to 1/30) 4x will be quartering the shutter speed (e.g. 1/60 to 1/15) and so on. This directly relates to the number of stops needed to compensate for the lessening of the light available. The “.3″ marking is simply a measure of the filters optical density and for each .3 increase, the amount of light decreases one stop.


Copyright Peter West Carey

Standard ND filters can be used in a variety of situations. For instance, shooting a waterfall in full sun can often result in a shutter speed only dropping as far as 1/30 of a second. This is not slow enough to get the veil action in the water many people desire to show movement. If a ND filter were to offer three stops less light, this could make the shutter speed 1/4 of a second, giving the water ample time to blur in motion.

There are also times in bright situations when wide aperture is desired but the shutter speed of the camera is already maxed out. In these case, when shallow depth of field is the ideal, two stops less light will be the key to shooting as desired. Lastly, with longer shutter speeds comes the ability to blur objects out of existence. I will show this in the Variable ND section but it can be achieved with any ND filter that blocks sufficient light so as to allow for very faint blur trails.


Copyright Peter West Carey

Copyright Peter West Carey

Copyright Peter West Carey

Variable Neutral Density


Copyright Peter West Carey

Taking the neutral density filter one step further, variable neutral density (VND) filters are an option for those seeking even more latitude. The advantage of these filters is the ability to cover a range of darkening, up to seven stops in some cases. The disadvantage is typically the cost and possibly the starting point in terms of stops.

Variable neutral density filters, by their nature, need to be circular. They function by having two layers with very small perforations and when juxtaposed with each other can allow or deny light to pass through. Think of stacking two screen on top of the each other. Requiring the filters to be circular often creates other limits. For instance, very wide angle lenses will start to show noted vignetting depending on the depth of the filter. Also, fisheye lenses will not work with this filter as a flat front element is needed.

The main advantage of the variable ND filter is the ability to dial in just the right amount of light for a desired effect. Let me demonstrate with the help of a variable ND lent to me by Singh-Ray, which has a range of 2 1/3 stops to 8 stops of density (darkening).

This first image is taken without a filter at the slowest shutter speed. Settings of f/13 and ISO 100 would allow 1/25 of a second.


Copyright Peter West Carey

Now, with the variable ND attached, the shutter speed drops to 1/5 when dialed to “minimum” mark on the side of the filter.


Copyright Peter West Carey

Notice the white streak in the foreground? That is the blurring of a car in the near lane. Much fainter than the truck in the first picture. The exposure has been reduced 2 1/3 stops. Now to move the VND to just before “maximum” and the result is shown below.


Copyright Peter West Carey

This shot has a shutter speed of 3.2 second and, unless you are looking carefully, you will not notice the very faint streaks of a car in the near lane. The streaks can be seen just above the guardrail in front of the tree on the right. Lastly, with the VND on maximum, a shutter speed of 10 seconds is achieved and no cars are visible, as well as a greater streaking to the steam from the stack in the distance.


Copyright Peter West Carey

Graduated Neutral Density


Copyright Peter West Carey

Graduated Neutral Density (GND) filters work well in a number of circumstances. The idea with a GND is to transition from an area of dark to light in a smooth manner. The amount of stops at the top of the filter varies from typically one stop to four stops and the transition can be either hard (nearly a solid line) to soft (fuzzier). The filters can be circular, square or rectangular and sizes will vary so they may be used with larger size lenses.

Often a GND is used to hold back a section of the frame that is brightly lit, like the sky. To our human eyes, which can see about 14 stops of light at one time, a range from brightly lit hills to darker valleys that are hard to make out. But modern cameras can only register 8-9 stops of light. In situations where the sky is bright and foreground is dark, the filter is held up to bring the sky (or mountains or any bright object) down closer the exposure of the other elements. This can help in evening scenes to a get more in line with the camera’s over all dynamic range.

By way of example, here are two shots of the same beach. I wanted to make sure the driftwood in the foreground was not too underexposed so as to be unusable while editing later. This shot was taken on a Canon 7D with an EF 10mm-22mm lens, ISO 100, 18mm, f/16, 1/50th of a second.


Copyright Peter West Carey

Notice the atomic sun? It’s hard to miss and ruins the shot. A look at the histogram, however, shows that the shadows do not clip, which is what I was planning on.


Copyright Peter West Carey

While the highlights clip, as shown with the white triangle in the upper right corner, (and there is far more information to the right that can’t be seen because of the clipping) the shadow detail is fine and within the sensor’s dynamic range. To bring the exposure of the sun down, I place a two stop GND so the soft transition ends where the foreground driftwood begins.


Copyright Peter West Carey

And the corresponding histogram.


Copyright Peter West Carey

The GND pulled a lot of the highlight information to the left. While there is now a bit of shadow clipping (mostly due to the silhouettes), far more information is retained for a better start in editing.

One key to GND filters (as well as the Reverse Graduated Neutral Density Filters) is to meter without the filter in place. Also, meter for the foreground in most cases and pick a filter that will bring the highlights down into range befitting of the sensor. Otherwise the camera will take the filtered area into consideration while metering and an overexposed picture will typically occur.

Reverse Graduated Neutral Density


Copyright Peter West Carey

Last is the Reverse Graduated Neutral Density Filter (RGND). This filter has a very special application, although with imagination, more can exist. Its primary function is to be used at sunrise and sunset in order to block out the intense light along the horizon, but then quickly transition lower to allow the foreground mountain or ocean or object which the sun is setting over to be seen. From the darkest point and up, the filter graduates to about one stop less near the top in order to hold the sky back.

Without a RGND filter, and just using a GND filter, the sun would be brighter than the sky above it, which would be held back with the GND. The RGND allows the sun itself to be held back, typically three stops. Again, metering for the foreground is what works best. Here is an example.


Copyright Peter West Carey

Copyright Peter West Carey

The shots have nearly identical exposures (the one on the right is only 1/3 of a stop darker than the left) and as can be seen in the histograms. The effect is more retained data with only the yellow highlights becoming slightly clipped.

Conclusion

Neutral Density filters of different types have varied and useful purposes when it comes to digital photography. Because of the limited dynamic range of most sensors, the filters help in a variety of situations where there is no better option than to tone down the brightness of a scene to accomplish what is needed. Be it straight ND or Variable, Graduated or Reverse Graduated, investing in ND filters will help advance most photographers’ abilities to present beautiful reproductions of the world around us.

If you’ve used a Neutral Density filter before, please post links to your results below in the comments. Share any tips or tricks you’ve picked up along the way as well.

  • DJ

    Very well written and concise tutorial — and interesting to boot!

  • http://photo.adesignstudio.net Alyo

    I’ve purchased a heliopan 8x ND filter recently because I wanted to increase my exposure times when shooting water in the middle of the day. I can happily report that even in the brightest days I could achieve exposure times over 1 sec.

    here are a few examples:
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/adesignstudio/6001015594/in/photostream
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/adesignstudio/6000466285/in/photostream

  • http://www.unbrokenhorse.com Sunira

    Loved this tutorial. Very relevant and widely used!
    I’ve always taken three exposures and blended but this would certainly save me some time. Got any specific product suggestions?

  • http://Royalkicker.com Hyde Stevenson

    Hi,

    Would have been nice to have the same post on DPS … because I read the same truncated post this week :(

    Regards,

    H.

  • Phil

    In the age of DSLR’s… do you really need a ND filter? Can’t you do the same thing with multiple exposures?

    • http://peterwestcarey.com Peter West Carey
      Author

      Phil,
      There is no way to not use an ND filter and shoot at 10 seconds in broad day light. As for using a graduated ND or doing it in the computer, I prefer to spend less time in front of a screen and more time shooting, and a graduated ND allows me to do that.
      pwc

      • Christian

        You could do multiple exposures and then combine them and average them. It’s called frame stacking I believe.

        It’s not quite the same thing but it’s the best option if you don’t have a ND filter.

        • Christian

          I forgot .. there is also the black card technique. You should be able to get similar results with this as with a graduated ND filter. It takes practice though and some trial and error.

  • Luis

    What ND filter would you recommend one begin with (2x, 4X) ?? I realize they have appropriate uses but not easy to buy all at same time.

    Thanks

    • http://peterwestcarey.com Peter West Caey
      Author

      Luis, it really does matter on what your scene is and how much you want to blur things. For a waterfall in board day light, you might want a 4x, for instance.

  • http://uptonart.net Dan

    A tip I’d heard from…somebody, I really don’t remember who… was to handhold your GND filter if possible instead of mounting it in a bracket. I think this was particularly true with filters with a harder edge between the ND and clear parts, but they remarked that especially on longer exposures they felt like the natural shake of the hand that would move/wobble the transition zone made for a more natural image.

  • Milos

    I didn’t try it but can you achieve similar effects using just simple sunglasses lens in front of your objective? Maybe it will change color and nature of original light, but it is worth trying, before buying some expensive filters.

    • http://peterwestcarey.com Peter West Carey
      Author

      Milos,
      Yes, you can certainly use regular sunglasses and they work well with smaller point and shoots. As you mention, there is some color change, but it works when you have nothing else. As the lens gets bigger, you need larger sunglasses so you don’t see the frame. The other problem is sunglasses are usually curved and that will change the focus and quality of the light.

  • Luis

    In a bind, I’ve known to use a polarizing filter — not quite the same as what Peter described here but it does reduce the amount of light seen by the lens.

  • Jim

    Has anyone ever heard of, or is there a good reason, to use a GND when the sun is at your BACK? Someone I know suggested they are used when the sun is behind you and I thought that odd, considering what they’re usually used for.

    • http://thecreyadventures.com Peter West Carey
      Author

      Jim,
      They are used to hold back the lighting in part of the image, so if the scene were not lit evenly, even from behind, there would be a benefit. Maybe they meant when the sun is rising, lighting distant mountains, but a field of wildflowers in the foreground is not yet lit. That is certainly a good time to use one.

  • http://vimeo.com/elliottower Elliot

    I really don’t see why not to get a ND filter. I got one for only 20 bucks, and it works great!

  • http://www.facebook.com/sudheendrasp Sreenivasa Sudheendra

    excellent tutorial :)

  • joe stumpf

    well i’ve been using them on various cameras….. a #2, #4, & #8…over a few years with interesting results…Just getting used to my new d7000,. and got a variable nd with all the markings. on ebay for 50. ..I really like this nd. it goes from open to completely black or like 1-1000. it also goes the other way, and all i can figure is one side is cooler, the other way slightly warmer..i really like not having to try to add another filter, or take away one to “figure out” the pictore. i use it on my new 18-105 nikon lens with a ring adapter…so it is a protector too. i did just use it on fireworks, and really liked the results..pics dont get washed out from too much light,…TIP..don’t use the black “card” way,..you inadvertantly always end up bumping the camera now & then…just get a piece of any black cloth,old sock,or black velvet is soft and nice.about 1 foot square.then you can cover top of camera. set yor time,or bulb, push shutter, then uncover lens when bursts are about to go off,.or when rocket climbs up,.then cover,.or cover when too many bursts,…uncoveriing,and covering. no camera movement. and dont need to mess with the times.and you can watch the show yourself. with this nd i could eaizly shoot 10 sec in bright daylight in manual with apiture set 22 or more…but my question is,,is any color of light spectrum lost in a nd shot ? that i might not want to use a nd filter? and does it still help in night shots, or just hinders avalible light ?

  • Cor

    Great article. I’ve been using a B+W 1024ND with great results. However, several of my shots come out warmer than the scene or even pinkish. The WB doesn’t seem to make a difference…typically I will sue AWB or daylight etc. Thoughts on what I might be doing wrong or ideas to compensate for this if it is caused by the filter? Thanks!