A Guide to Perfect Portrait Posing and More

A Guide to Perfect Portrait Posing and More

As an aspiring-to-go-pro photographer or a casual shooter, it’s important to understand the basics of portrait photography, whether your posing a spouse, child, friend or a bona fide model. Not only will your images seem more professional and polished, your model will look more attractive.


Introduction

By taking care in not only how your model is posed, but also paying attention to the background, you will minimize your postprocessing workflow. For example, it is much easier and faster to take a minute or two to clean up and remove the offending clutter, lint, or errant strand of hair before shooting than spending an hour cloning it out in dozens of individual pictures.

There are hundreds of different poses, and this tutorial will cover only a few of the common ones along with some suggestions such as the camera angle, composition and poses. A caveat: there is no one-size-fits-all technique when it comes to working with your model. A body position or camera angle that works for one person may not for the next.

Let’s start with a quick overview of composition in portrait photography.

  • The Rule of Thirds: know it. And when you know it, you can break it. The better you understand why this rule of thirds is so effective, the better you understand when to break it.
  • Centering: avoid centering your subject; instead frame the model slightly off to the side. This has been proven to be more aesthetically pleasing. It has to do with what’s called the “golden ratio.” Observe television shows and movies; you’ll notice that the actors are often shot off center for this very reason. This is obviously related to the rule of thirds as well.
  • Amputation: when framing the portrait, avoid cropping your subject at their joints. This has the illusion of amputating a limb and is generally undesirable.
  • Eyes: Focus on the eyes. It can look strange if your model’s ear or hair is in focus, but not her face.
  • Camera angle: If you’re shooting an image in which your model’s face fills most of the frame, make sure the camera is a few inches above her nose. Nostrils are not attractive. And this compels your subject to look up at the lens, which is more pleasing. The angle will help thin out their face slightly. If you’re photographing a woman that is bottom heavy, aka “pear-shaped” or heavy-weight, avoid shooting from below. Shooting from extreme low or high above will exaggerate people’s proportions; photographing low to the ground makes the hips seem overly large and the head small. And the opposite is (usually) true if shooting your subject from above may help make a heavyset person seem slimmer.
  • Distance: some photographers are wary of getting too close to their subject. This has the end result in which the main subject – the model- is just a speck, too small to have any real impact. Practice filling the frame.

Posing

This site has a great posing guide created by Lynn Herrick to help you get started. It depicts over 200 different poses that you can use as a reference.

“Football Shoulders”:

Hunched up shoulders are never attractive. It makes your model seem like they have no neck. Ask your model to sit or stand up straight and lower their shoulders.


Photo by ifraud

A common pose an amateur model may adopt is a three-quarter turn with the shoulder raised, hiding the neck and chin or jaws. While this may feel coquettish in your subject’s mind, all it accomplishes is hiding the model’s neck and makes the shoulder nearest the camera seem overly large and rounded. Have them drop the near-shoulder downward instead.

If you choose to have your model laying down on the floor looking at the camera, remind them to support themselves to avoid hunched up shoulders.

Slouching

Similarly to the “football shoulders,” slouching simply isn’t attractive, not even if they’re a model on the ANTM show. Tell your model to straighten up! This also has the effect of helping your subject appear slimmer, taller and more poised.

Head tilt

Up, down, side…experiment with the different possibilities to see what’s most flattering for your model.


Photo by Kevin Dooley

If your model protests taking many pictures with slightly different head and shoulder poses, point out that actors and actresses often practice their poses for the red carpet, and then know which pose to strike that will be the most flattering.

Chin

Some people have double-chins or may be tucking their chin subconsciously. Make them aware of this. If excess skin is still visible, change your camera and lighting angle to slightly above to minimize it.


Photo by jcoterhais

Standing

If your subject is squared off with the camera, this has the effect of making them look broader. This may work well for a male subject; however, for a female, this usually is not a desirable stance; a slight angle will be more slimming and attractive. Place all the weight on the leg furthest from the camera and the other leg bent or extended.


Photo by Lauren Nelson

Environment

The surrounding in which you take the picture of your model is equally important. If you’re shooting indoor, ie. at home, be sure to take a moment and declutter. A neat, tidy room is far more attractive than a room full of magazines, papers, toys and books. By cleaning (or temporarily relocating) the mess, you will ensure that the focus of your audience remains where it belongs: on your subject.

If you’re shooting outdoor, the background is still important – the last thing you want is a pole or tree growing out of your subject’s head. Oftentimes just moving either the camera or your subject a couple feet to the left or right will fix the errant-growth issue.


Clothing

Black Vs Color

Many photographers recommend dark, solid clothing articles because it’s perceived as more slimming. In contrast, I recommend bright, well-fitting clothes. Most casual or beginner photographers lack the studio lighting to adequately light a subject clad in black/dark clothing and the details of both their clothes and body are lost in the shadows.


Photo by Alaskan Dude

As you can see in the above image, the green shirt shows a lot of detail, where a white or black shirt may may have look flat.

While clothes do not need to be solid, patterns and prints are perfectly fine, the subtler the print, the better. If your model has a polka-dot shirt and the environment is cluttered/busy, the overall look can be chaotic and may appear more like a typical snapshot than a well thought out portrait. On the other hand, a polka-dot shirt, a coordinating, solid-colored pants and a well-chosen background can be a stellar combination.

Sleeves

Another suggestion is to request your model to wear tops with sleeves. Unless your subject is fit and toned, a tank or sleeveless top will just make your model’s arms seem larger. Having them hold the arms slightly away from the body (do take care that this seems natural) will also help them appear slimmer as well.


Creative

Portraits don’t need to always be a standard headshot or body shot. Get creative with how you frame your model. Focus on one body part. Make use of props.

Sometimes less is more. Use a prop and frame carefully to obscure most of your model.


Have fun!

The most important part of making portraits is your. While very occasionally, you’ll find a model having a really bad day, 99% of the time your in control of the situation and the model is feeding off your energy. If you’re asking your model to smile for 30 minutes straight, you better be smiling, too. Show a lot of energy. Talk about things that reflect of the mood of your shoot. Most importantly, talk. Engage your subject. And finally, keep in mind, you are not performing a root canal. It’s photography, it’s supposed to be fun, so have a great time while you’re shooting.

  • Rockgod

    Great basic tips. However the photos could’ve used a bit softer light and a happier model.

  • http://www.danielsone.com Daniel S.

    These are some good ideas and rules to follow. However, the effect of the photographic examples is almost completely obscured by the awful lighting. The angle and quality of the light just kills your point.

    Composition usually trumps lighting, but when it comes to portraits that equation is actually the other way around. Portraiture is the most challenging thing to do in photography because we’re so used to seeing other people that even a layperson can spot something “wrong” or “odd” with an image. Find your light first, then pose accordingly … or move your light.

    • http://www.unbrokenhorse.com Sunira

      I was going to make the same comment. The example photos are as important as the tips when it comes to articles for photographers.

  • Sam

    Yikes, THIS is the portrait tutorial? One of the most important and basic tutorials that exists and THIS is what phototuts decided to go with? I’m sorry, but the photo examples are so horrible that they overshadow whatever the tutorial might be. If I’m a young, inspiring photographer, why would I read a tutorial that results in this kind of photo? Sure, maybe the instructions are good, but why would I even read them if the end result is so bad?

    If a chef showed you a dinner that looked completely disgusting and asked if you would like instructions on how to make it, would you really want those instructions?

  • http://photo.adesignstudio.net Alyo

    All I can say about this article is: FAIL…epic FAIL

  • Ed

    Basically, I think everyone is saying the model isn’t the most attractive one they’ve ever seen?

    I get the advice, but yes it is a pretty bad example…

    • http://www.unbrokenhorse.com Sunira

      Well no, I don’t think the problem stems from the way she looks. Anyone is going to look ghastly in that lighting. The author makes some good points about basic portraiture, but she should have found a window or some beautiful natural lighting to shoot the model with.

      Anyway, the article is good. Just ignore the images?

  • VCE

    I’ve rarely seen such terrible photos accompanying a supposed expert how-to. The poor girl never had a chance of looking good. She looks horribly awkward in all the shots and she isn’t helped by the atrocious lighting. Having spent a lot of time working in a professional portrait studio, I can confidently state that many of the tips in this article CAN result in great shots, but not if the model is massively uncomfortable and the lighting is like something out of a horror movie. Good grief.

    • http://www.unbrokenhorse.com Sunira

      It appears she may just be applying her lighting techniques from her previous article about low key photography: http://photo.tutsplus.com/articles/lighting-articles/an-in-depth-introduction-to-low-key-photography-photo-premium/

    • http://www.danielsone.com Daniel S.

      Firstly, the author’s profile never says she is was pro, but aspiring to become one — meaning she’s either a beginner or an amateur. This status is evident in the photographs. So, this isn’t a professional photographer that provided the images.

      Poking fun at her appearance by essentially calling her ugly has no place here and is a demonstration at your lack of professionalism and/or maturity.

  • Aaje

    I’m guessing the pictures are Jennifer Carrigan (the author of the article) herself?

    To the author: The light really is horrible! Do invest in something like a softbox or umbrella. Bare flash really doesn’t do wonders. And in none of the images the model (you?) is smiling. A real pity, because the article itself is just fine, but the pictures totally distract from the message.

    • Raoul

      What else would you expect from someone that has been teaching herself photography since the start of the year… a bit sad to be regurgitating out of books when she hasn’t mastered it yet.

  • MIchael Owens

    Wow, sorry – but the totally uninterested looking model, and the downright depressing mood they convey totally threw me off reading this article.

    I was looking forward to this one too, and now – I feel let down.

    Can we try it with a model who smiles?

    Please. Please!

  • Dan Howard

    envato’s blog posts are getting worse.

    I came here for inspiration… and didn’t find it.

  • DKenny

    What is happening here??
    Yes this girl might not be photogenic to the extreme, however many photos have been taken of people who are not photogenic and people do not complain about them.

    But MY GOD!!! The light-setup!!!
    Shock, horror I can not believe it …. this is truly and genuinely the worst example I have ever seen from someone who “knows what they are talking about”.
    This is a representation of how to NOT to setup lights, everything that can go wrong has gone wrong…. my grandmother would setup better light after having seen 2 Youtube videos in basic light control.
    How did this person get access and pass quality control for this site? Are you so desperate here that you take on any person no matter what who call themselves a photographer???
    Me = disappointed to the extreme how this site is developing (or rather being corrupted/downgraded).

  • Cameron Knight

    Thanks for commenting everyone. Your opinions have not gone unnoticed. We are constantly working to improve Phototuts+. We appreciate your input and thanks for taking the time to write. Over the next few days, we’ll be working to make this particular article better.

  • Jennifer
    Author

    I’m the author of this article.

    This article was written for a brand new photographer and the idea behind it was to capture images using the same equipment that an average beginner photographer would have access to. No studio lights, no photoshopping, average-looking model, etc. The images that were originally in the article (they’ve since been swapped out) were less than stellar, I agree, and I debated quite a bit whether to use them versus the better, more polished ones.

    Obviously that approach was the wrong one. I appreciated the comments, especially the constructive ones, and will not use this approach again.

    Thank you everybody. This will help me improve my future articles.
    Jen

    • http://www.danielsone.com Daniel S.

      Jennifer,

      I don’t think you should have swapped out the original images for the new ones because now the comments and ratings will not match. It’s also a good reminder for what not to do when writing these kinds of articles. So, hiding your mistakes in that fashion isn’t a good idea.

      Lacking access to equipment isn’t an excuse for the poor quality of the originals. When I started out a little over 10 years ago, I had a 1965 Nikon FTn, a desk lamp, and a piece of cardboard with aluminum foil on it. All the other times I used the sun.

      Also, the average appearance of your model and lack of photoshop doesn’t compensate for the image quality either.

      What you listed as reasons for the poor images are actually irrelevant because they just looked like no effort was put into them. To me, they just look lazy even though you may have totally rearranged your room for it.

      Finally, I’m also personally against people using Flickr’s creative-commons images for examples they could have easily shot themselves. I’ve used it sparingly but only after determining it wasn’t feasible (time, money, etc.) for the article. Why take someone else’s portraiture when you could benefit doubly from doing it yourself — especially since you’re a beginner?

      Good photography is a lot of work, unglamorous work. Keep it up.

      • http://www.johndunnephotography.com/ John Dunne

        I visited here from my RSS feed with the specific intent on commenting on the images used to support this article. However it looks like a great many have already offered plenty of feedback.

        And to Daniel’s point, it seems to be an increasing trend in blogs recently to use someone else’s work (Flickr CC, etc) to support the writers tutorials or tips. I frankly don’t get this! Surely if you know enough to write an article you should be able to prove it with examples of where you applied it in your own work? Otherwise why would I trust you enough to bother reading your advise?

        BTW this last comment is not aimed at the author of this article per se but Envato themselves, and indeed many other publishers out there that don’t seem to vet their writers enough to see if they are in an actual position of authority to write an article in the first place. */rant over/*

    • http://www.wet-photo.at/ WET

      I also largely agree with Daniel S.: “Lacking access to equipment isn’t an excuse for the poor quality of the originals.” Because when you need e.g. a diffuser, you take a white bed sheet or something like that.

      Anyway, you could just redo your shots? The big advantage they had when compared to the “new” photos: They were showing the wrong and the right pose. But Daniel (& isi) also addressed this issue in his post :D

  • isi

    I have seen the original pictures and can understand some of the critique. What I liked about the first approach, however, was the comparison of the dos and donts. I’d very much appreciate a new set of images with the same model in a good and in a bad pose, so that you can compare them and see the improvements you can achieve with good posing. That would really help to train the eye.

  • Jake Farsi

    Wow.. All of these amateur writers here on phototuts should step back and really edit the article before submitting. New rule please… No awful example images combined with poor technical info.

  • http://www.portraitposes.org bjmercado

    I understand some of the comments. But to clarify that sample of “portrait photos” has their own uniqueness and quality of course. Its should be admire a simple shot sometimes became a masterpiece of someone. Don’t discourage the will of some instead support them and be proud.

  • purple

    after searching my username, I came across this article. while the tips were okay, more disturbing was running into one of my self portraits. while i admit it isn’t great, i’m also not a professional photographer. in fact, i don’t classify myself as a photographer at all, just a person that takes pictures rarely. using my photo to demonstrate what is not to be done is one thing, but you took down the original photos, thus destroying the integrity of the article. Let’s see your work.

  • stephen

    Wow.. what a blog. I have read tonnes of books, ebooks, articles and forum comments but this is straight to the point. no nonsense jargon about apertures, iso, D.O.V’s etc etc… very helpful thankyou

  • Bree

    I find it disappointing that so many people can be so harsh and snooty. Personally I didn’t see a problem, I think people failed to see it in the vein it was written. She’s giving tips on the BASICS of taking portraits, and I took that to mean for anyone with any kind of camera at any given moment. Not people with special equipment and/or a shooting session booked in where there’s time to set up a studio or allow for “magic hour” natural light. If all those people being narky are so profficient and qualified to make such criticisms why are they reading an article on the basics?
    2 seconds ago · Like

  • Adrian

    Did everyone miss the point? The portraits are bad on purpose! Don’t have you model pose like the examples…

    You think yourself better than you are (like most people that own a DSLR) rather than looking to see how you could learn you just want to show what you know and proving you don’t know a lot at all.

  • http://www.wix.com/simonabarbu1/simonabarbuphotography Simona Dumitru

    I think it is a good tutorial. I also like the choice of images. They do prove the point. To make it perfect, probably it would be ideal to have a before and after picture of the same subject. The before, the images already used and after with another set of images ( same subjects ) but with the corrected posture.